Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Wiz Imp

(9,269 posts)

29. If the statute of limitations had run out on all the possible crimes to charge Epstein co-conspirators with

Reply to drray23 (Reply #19)

Mon Feb 2, 2026, 09:52 PM

Monday

Then there would be no reason to further investigate any claims and the DOJ would have zero justification for holding back any files.

Sexual abuse statutes of limitations vary from state to state, though in many states, the statutes of limitation have been eliminated if the victim was 16 or younger. Regardless of possible criminal charges, I believe victims could still file civil charges in most states. That wouldn't put the perpetrators in jail, but it could cost them tons of money and basically destroy them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Attorney General Todd Blanche just admitted the DOJ excluded images showing "death, physical abuse, or injury" [View all] Nittersing Monday OP

While failing to redact victims identity Bobstandard Monday #1

Yes, but they made up for it Dale in Laurel MD Monday #6

The only identities they were working to redact slightlv Monday #10

Death? Physical abuse? Boomerproud Monday #2

How many young girls who got sucked into Putin & Epstein's international child sex trafficking ring via .. Botany Monday #24

Yet no one can be charged? boston bean Monday #3

Unfortunately. GB_RN Monday #16

Sexual abuse like rape of underage people has no statute of limitation.nt. drray23 Monday #19

Depends on the state EdmondDantes_ Monday #26

If the statute of limitations had run out on all the possible crimes to charge Epstein co-conspirators with Wiz Imp Monday #29

Why is he protecting these psychos Blues Heron Monday #4

Most likely because THEY have dirt on HIM. MLWR Monday #21

Wait, wut? n/t leftstreet Monday #5

It's really bad. Congress has a decision to make... Joinfortmill Monday #7

They need to deploy cadaver dogs to ALL of johnnyfins Monday #13

Please Scotland. Do it now! johnnyfins Monday #14

Pieces of trash. Clouds Passing Monday #20

Does that include Epstein's death or just the victims? Uncle Joe Monday #8

Might be neither. Igel Monday #11

Sascha Riley claims that Epstein and others definitely produced snuff films Wiz Imp Monday #30

Evidence "not produced" Alice Kramden Monday #9

Yeah... obviously. slightlv Monday #12

So evidence of the worst crimes is excluded? Diraven Monday #15

Remember.....Releasing the Files purr-rat beauty Monday #17

You can bet your sweet bippy popsdenver Monday #18

Attorney General Todd Blanche just admitted the DOJ excluded images showing "death, physical abuse, or injury" MLWR Monday #22

Todd, you really need to find another job PatSeg Monday #23

K&R spanone Monday #25

Is this another of his "humanely" rants? bucolic_frolic Monday #27

K&R UTUSN Monday #28

Photos released in Epstein dump not enough evidence to prosecute, Blanche says Mosby Monday #31

The Epstein law itself requires the DOJ to provide detailed justifications for every single Wiz Imp Monday #32

There was an extortion email claiming two girls were buried near Zoro ranch. mackdaddy Monday #33

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Attorney General Todd Bla...»Reply #29