Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Wiz Imp

(9,256 posts)

32. The Epstein law itself requires the DOJ to provide detailed justifications for every single

Reply to Nittersing (Original post)

Mon Feb 2, 2026, 10:04 PM

Monday

document, picture, video, etc. that they fail to release. An example of what the law requires is that the DOJ would have to explicitly say they can't release Video A because it shows Epstein physically abusing a minor, or video B because it shows him injuring a minor. The law also only prohibits those items from being released publicly, it doesn't prevent them from being released to Congress.

The generic statement from Blanche ain't remotely close to sufficient.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Attorney General Todd Blanche just admitted the DOJ excluded images showing "death, physical abuse, or injury" [View all] Nittersing Monday OP

While failing to redact victims identity Bobstandard Monday #1

Yes, but they made up for it Dale in Laurel MD Monday #6

The only identities they were working to redact slightlv Monday #10

Death? Physical abuse? Boomerproud Monday #2

How many young girls who got sucked into Putin & Epstein's international child sex trafficking ring via .. Botany Monday #24

Yet no one can be charged? boston bean Monday #3

Unfortunately. GB_RN Monday #16

Sexual abuse like rape of underage people has no statute of limitation.nt. drray23 Monday #19

Depends on the state EdmondDantes_ Monday #26

If the statute of limitations had run out on all the possible crimes to charge Epstein co-conspirators with Wiz Imp Monday #29

Why is he protecting these psychos Blues Heron Monday #4

Most likely because THEY have dirt on HIM. MLWR Monday #21

Wait, wut? n/t leftstreet Monday #5

It's really bad. Congress has a decision to make... Joinfortmill Monday #7

They need to deploy cadaver dogs to ALL of johnnyfins Monday #13

Please Scotland. Do it now! johnnyfins Monday #14

Pieces of trash. Clouds Passing Monday #20

Does that include Epstein's death or just the victims? Uncle Joe Monday #8

Might be neither. Igel Monday #11

Sascha Riley claims that Epstein and others definitely produced snuff films Wiz Imp Monday #30

Evidence "not produced" Alice Kramden Monday #9

Yeah... obviously. slightlv Monday #12

So evidence of the worst crimes is excluded? Diraven Monday #15

Remember.....Releasing the Files purr-rat beauty Monday #17

You can bet your sweet bippy popsdenver Monday #18

Attorney General Todd Blanche just admitted the DOJ excluded images showing "death, physical abuse, or injury" MLWR Monday #22

Todd, you really need to find another job PatSeg Monday #23

K&R spanone Monday #25

Is this another of his "humanely" rants? bucolic_frolic Monday #27

K&R UTUSN Monday #28

Photos released in Epstein dump not enough evidence to prosecute, Blanche says Mosby Monday #31

The Epstein law itself requires the DOJ to provide detailed justifications for every single Wiz Imp Monday #32

There was an extortion email claiming two girls were buried near Zoro ranch. mackdaddy Monday #33

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Attorney General Todd Bla...»Reply #32