Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)DHS Hunts Down 67-Year-Old U.S. Citizen Who Criticized Them in Email [View all]
https://newrepublic.com/post/206088/homeland-security-67-year-old-us-citizen-criticized-emailThe Department of Homeland Security is using a little-known tool to go after its critics.
The Trump administration is targeting free speech with a little-known legal tool: administrative subpoenas.
The Washington Post reports that a retired Philadelphia man, Jon, 67, found himself in the government's crosshairs after he emailed a lead prosecutor at the Department of Homeland Security, Joseph Dernbach, who was handling the deportation case of an Afghan refugee, identified as H, asking him to consider that the man's life was in danger from the Taliban.
"Mr. Dernbach, don't play Russian roulette with H's life," Jon wrote from his gmail account. "Err on the side of caution. There's a reason the US government along with many other governments don't recognise the Taliban. Apply principles of common sense and decency."
Later that day, Jon received an email from Google notifying him that an administrative subpoena had been sent to them from the Department of Homeland Security "compelling the release of information related to your Google Account." Federal agencies can issue such subpoenas without an order from a judge or grand jury, and Google gave Jon, who withheld his last name to protect his family from the government, one week to challenge it.
Laws are supposed to restrict the use of administrative subpoenas, but DHS has used the tool against dissent protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution. Jon could not find who in the agency issued the subpoena, let alone a record of it to show an attorney.
. . .
The Washington Post reports that a retired Philadelphia man, Jon, 67, found himself in the government's crosshairs after he emailed a lead prosecutor at the Department of Homeland Security, Joseph Dernbach, who was handling the deportation case of an Afghan refugee, identified as H, asking him to consider that the man's life was in danger from the Taliban.
"Mr. Dernbach, don't play Russian roulette with H's life," Jon wrote from his gmail account. "Err on the side of caution. There's a reason the US government along with many other governments don't recognise the Taliban. Apply principles of common sense and decency."
Later that day, Jon received an email from Google notifying him that an administrative subpoena had been sent to them from the Department of Homeland Security "compelling the release of information related to your Google Account." Federal agencies can issue such subpoenas without an order from a judge or grand jury, and Google gave Jon, who withheld his last name to protect his family from the government, one week to challenge it.
Laws are supposed to restrict the use of administrative subpoenas, but DHS has used the tool against dissent protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution. Jon could not find who in the agency issued the subpoena, let alone a record of it to show an attorney.
. . .
23 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DHS Hunts Down 67-Year-Old U.S. Citizen Who Criticized Them in Email [View all]
erronis
15 hrs ago
OP
DU pages have new ads that make the page one is reading jump, and one loses it place in the article.
Escurumbele
14 hrs ago
#4
I don't see these issues. I am a star member and I also have a ton of blockers in Firefox.
erronis
14 hrs ago
#5
They're harassing him and they think it might get known around so as to intimidate the rest of us. n/t
Liberal In Texas
1 hr ago
#23