Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(93,742 posts)
9. of course they're NOT inadequate, but we're not in control of what's in the bill, republicans are
Thu Feb 5, 2026, 08:11 PM
Thursday

...this is a list of demands that Democrats believe is achievable in getting a handful of republicans' support needed to pass the damn thing.

All of those ideals of yours are for a Democratic majority, not the republican majority that's enabled all of this violence. No Democratic majority would allow this, so it's absurd to act as if Democrats can just implement what they want.

It's specious reasoning, and based on either a profound misunderstanding or disregard of basic political realities of a minority party, or a disregard of the importance of passing meaningful reforms RIGHT NOW that can be signed into law to SAVE LIVES.

Pretending like Democrats have the power to do more to influence REPUBLICANS to act by saying something or the other isn't a serious argument. Likewise, pretending that Democrats can just write in what they want to the bill and make it law is just false.

So, you're left with this demand that Democrats insist on what they know won't be accepted by republicans, or the president who has to sign it into law; hell, you should know that.

Just stand there and make demands. Or, better yet, do nothing and leave us without any defense while you shout at them until the midterms.

No fucking thanks. I want what's achievable now.

I NEED WHAT'S ACHIEVABLE NOW, and we can argue when we get the majority about the finer points of our individual projections for the party.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I agree Progressive dog Thursday #1
language is weak. needs a list of demands and consequences IMO. prettyplease nt msongs Thursday #2
we don't actually have a bill bigtree Thursday #13
Bigtree, much of what you say rings true, but legislation is not the only political end Ilikepurple Thursday #15
I have to wonder, looking at the polls bigtree Thursday #19
act as if....set an assertive tone, hat in hand is not gonna cut it when stronger msongs Thursday #16
I don't agree that they are 'hat in hand' bigtree Thursday #18
I can't think of a single safety reason that would require a mask for ICE Bayard Thursday #3
and Democrats haven't allowed for any bigtree Thursday #12
Thank you for the discussion, bigtree. ❤️ littlemissmartypants Thursday #4
The demands aren't caving but I wish Shumer had been shouting and shamming the DHS and Republicans. nt ShazamIam Thursday #5
Anything short of abolishing ICE is caving Orrex Thursday #6
In the first place, these panty-faced goons are half-literate sadistic LEO rejects who can't Gaugamela Thursday #7
of course they're NOT inadequate, but we're not in control of what's in the bill, republicans are bigtree Thursday #9
Bless you Bigtree! BaronChocula Thursday #8
Here is what I don't get: James48 Thursday #10
K&R mcar Thursday #11
This message was self-deleted by its author Scrivener7 Thursday #14
Most of the people making those claims didn't even bother to read the details. FascismIsDeath Thursday #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democratic leaders demand...»Reply #9