Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(78,646 posts)

1. Kick

Mon Feb 9, 2026, 09:04 PM

Monday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kick SheltieLover Monday #1

Thanks! highplainsdem Tuesday #16

Yw! SheltieLover Tuesday #17

Is it accepted that generative AI reasons? Iris Monday #2

Depends on the person EdmondDantes_ Tuesday #8

The main problem is how to assess evidence. Happy Hoosier Tuesday #23

Thank you for providing this context. Iris Thursday #30

The reasoning aspect is key. cachukis Monday #3

This message was self-deleted by its author Whiskeytide Tuesday #10

I like your Spock/Kirk analogy, but then I thought ... Whiskeytide Tuesday #11

I think Spock recognized humanity as a whole cloth. cachukis Tuesday #24

I wonder how this affects ... rog Monday #4

That's an issue that seems to be coming up again and again . . . hatrack Tuesday #18

Same reason I refuse to use AI when writing or researching . . . hatrack Tuesday #20

You may be missing my point ... rog Tuesday #21

I just got back from an appointment with my vascular surgeon. rog Tuesday #27

I wonder how Neuro-sama would do on the test sakabatou Tuesday #6

In a way, this is a computerized version of odins folly Tuesday #7

This explains why... purr-rat beauty Tuesday #9

LLM's can't really reason. Happy Hoosier Tuesday #22

You are using the language of the AI promoters. hunter Tuesday #26

I work in software development. Such Anthropomorphic language is common. Happy Hoosier Tuesday #29

AI expert Gary Marcus's response to that paper: highplainsdem Tuesday #28