Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(9,485 posts)
22. Right here:
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 11:22 AM
Feb 11
https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IF/HTML/IF12827.html

At the time of the benchmark revision, estimates of employment changes in the 11 months before and 9 months after March are adjusted proportionately to match the new, more accurate March employment levels by industry.


That means data are revised back 21 months from the present. (April 2024 thru December 2025).

BLS annual benchmark revisions, which have been part of regular BLS employment estimation processes since 1935.


The process has not changed in 90 years.

Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yet the billionaires Trump sycophants keep artificially inflating the Stock Market. Chasstev365 Feb 11 #1
What you're seeing is a total divorce for working people and economic indicators Johnny2X2X Feb 11 #3
It's not billionaires doing that, it is us WSHazel Feb 11 #4
If you believe this report, UpInArms Feb 11 #2
Does this count all the jobs lost? nt leftyladyfrommo Feb 11 #5
We need to add 140,000 jobs per month to keep up with population growth Johnny2X2X Feb 11 #6
There is no statistical justification for pulling 800,000 jobs out of 2024 WSHazel Feb 11 #7
You have no clue what you're talking about Wiz Imp Feb 11 #12
Slow your roll WSHazel Feb 11 #15
There was a change in how small businesses are calculated EdmondDantes_ Feb 11 #16
I get that for the most part WSHazel Feb 11 #18
Last time I respond to you but to repeat, you have no clue how the Benchmark revision process works. Wiz Imp Feb 11 #21
I understand what the words say WSHazel Feb 11 #23
Extremely weak & misleading explanation. Wiz Imp Feb 11 #19
Not necessarily. EdmondDantes_ Feb 11 #28
Wow! Dunning Kruger in action! Wiz Imp Feb 11 #17
Are you being deliberately obtuse? WSHazel Feb 11 #20
Right here: Wiz Imp Feb 11 #22
Just so we are aware of your position WSHazel Feb 11 #25
🙄 Wiz Imp Feb 11 #26
One final thing. Wiz Imp Feb 11 #27
Not a hard concept WSHazel Feb 11 #31
I do not believe we added 130,000 jobs in January 2026 OrlandoDem2 Feb 11 #8
That's not a good number Johnny2X2X Feb 11 #9
How has unemployment not gone higher? Johonny Feb 11 #10
It's risen some, like a half point Johnny2X2X Feb 11 #11
Media making it sound like these job numbers Johonny Feb 11 #13
These numbers are a total disaster Johnny2X2X Feb 11 #14
Because many people, myself included, just stop looking TexasBushwhacker Feb 11 #24
MaddowBlog-New report shows 2025 was even worse for U.S. job market than we thought LetMyPeopleVote Feb 11 #29
I'm old enough to remember Johnny2X2X Feb 11 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BLS jobs report revises 2...»Reply #22