Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WSHazel

(664 posts)
23. I understand what the words say
Wed Feb 11, 2026, 11:29 AM
Feb 11

They already made a massive revision to 2024, and now they are making another massive revision. The BLS is saying that its original estimate was revised down by 60% over the next two years. Incidentally, both massive downward revisions occurred under a President that constantly attacks the prior President who was originally credited with the job growth.

Has there ever been an 800,000 job downward revision to two years earlier in the history of the BLS?

I don't know if you are a closet MAGA or why you are taking it this personally, but the numbers look like bulls***, and the market agrees with me on this.

You can keep calling me stupid and provide all the links you want, I know I am right, and I think you know I am right too.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yet the billionaires Trump sycophants keep artificially inflating the Stock Market. Chasstev365 Feb 11 #1
What you're seeing is a total divorce for working people and economic indicators Johnny2X2X Feb 11 #3
It's not billionaires doing that, it is us WSHazel Feb 11 #4
If you believe this report, UpInArms Feb 11 #2
Does this count all the jobs lost? nt leftyladyfrommo Feb 11 #5
We need to add 140,000 jobs per month to keep up with population growth Johnny2X2X Feb 11 #6
There is no statistical justification for pulling 800,000 jobs out of 2024 WSHazel Feb 11 #7
You have no clue what you're talking about Wiz Imp Feb 11 #12
Slow your roll WSHazel Feb 11 #15
There was a change in how small businesses are calculated EdmondDantes_ Feb 11 #16
I get that for the most part WSHazel Feb 11 #18
Last time I respond to you but to repeat, you have no clue how the Benchmark revision process works. Wiz Imp Feb 11 #21
I understand what the words say WSHazel Feb 11 #23
Extremely weak & misleading explanation. Wiz Imp Feb 11 #19
Not necessarily. EdmondDantes_ Feb 11 #28
Wow! Dunning Kruger in action! Wiz Imp Feb 11 #17
Are you being deliberately obtuse? WSHazel Feb 11 #20
Right here: Wiz Imp Feb 11 #22
Just so we are aware of your position WSHazel Feb 11 #25
🙄 Wiz Imp Feb 11 #26
One final thing. Wiz Imp Feb 11 #27
Not a hard concept WSHazel Feb 11 #31
I do not believe we added 130,000 jobs in January 2026 OrlandoDem2 Feb 11 #8
That's not a good number Johnny2X2X Feb 11 #9
How has unemployment not gone higher? Johonny Feb 11 #10
It's risen some, like a half point Johnny2X2X Feb 11 #11
Media making it sound like these job numbers Johonny Feb 11 #13
These numbers are a total disaster Johnny2X2X Feb 11 #14
Because many people, myself included, just stop looking TexasBushwhacker Feb 11 #24
MaddowBlog-New report shows 2025 was even worse for U.S. job market than we thought LetMyPeopleVote Feb 11 #29
I'm old enough to remember Johnny2X2X Feb 11 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BLS jobs report revises 2...»Reply #23