Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Iris

(16,862 posts)

30. Thank you for providing this context.

Reply to highplainsdem (Reply #13)

Thu Feb 12, 2026, 06:44 PM

Thursday

I'm an AI skeptic and am trying to keep myself educated about what's happening so I'll be looking at the links you shared more closely but wanted to be sure to thank you while this thread is still active!

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A very pro-AI account on both Bluesky and X posted about a "disturbing" Stanford paper on LLMs' failures at reasoning [View all] highplainsdem Monday OP

Kick SheltieLover Monday #1

Thanks! highplainsdem Tuesday #16

Yw! SheltieLover Tuesday #17

Is it accepted that generative AI reasons? Iris Monday #2

Depends on the person EdmondDantes_ Tuesday #8

It's called reasoning by people working on and promoting AI, but it's really more a pretense of highplainsdem Tuesday #13

The main problem is how to assess evidence. Happy Hoosier Tuesday #23

Thank you for providing this context. Iris Thursday #30

The reasoning aspect is key. cachukis Monday #3

This message was self-deleted by its author Whiskeytide Tuesday #10

I like your Spock/Kirk analogy, but then I thought ... Whiskeytide Tuesday #11

I think Spock recognized humanity as a whole cloth. cachukis Tuesday #24

I wonder how this affects ... rog Monday #4

Whether or not an AI model shows its reasoning - its pretense of reasoning - you should never trust highplainsdem Tuesday #14

That's an issue that seems to be coming up again and again . . . hatrack Tuesday #18

With the "bonus" of dumbing yourself down, de-skilling yourself, as you try to let the AI do the work. highplainsdem Tuesday #19

Same reason I refuse to use AI when writing or researching . . . hatrack Tuesday #20

You may be missing my point ... rog Tuesday #21

Summarizing isn't something AI is good at, judging by examples I've seen. Organizing by subject or highplainsdem Tuesday #25

I just got back from an appointment with my vascular surgeon. rog Tuesday #27

The most clueless dogs I've met have better internal models of reality than any AI. hunter Tuesday #5

I've never forgotten a software engineer and machine learning expert saying an amoeba is more intelligent than an LLM. highplainsdem Tuesday #15

I wonder how Neuro-sama would do on the test sakabatou Tuesday #6

In a way, this is a computerized version of odins folly Tuesday #7

This explains why... purr-rat beauty Tuesday #9

Sam Altman is a serial liar who's fired everywhere he's been - including Open AI. 617Blue Tuesday #12

LLM's can't really reason. Happy Hoosier Tuesday #22

You are using the language of the AI promoters. hunter Tuesday #26

I work in software development. Such Anthropomorphic language is common. Happy Hoosier Tuesday #29

AI expert Gary Marcus's response to that paper: highplainsdem Tuesday #28