Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bigtree

(93,902 posts)

16. I agree on that

Reply to 617Blue (Reply #12)

Fri Feb 20, 2026, 01:53 PM

Feb 20

...but I'm pleased to see that SOMETHING got their attention enough for them to try and reassert the Constitutional primacy of Congress in allocating or directing money.

Like everything in this world, many don't care until their own ox gets gored.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

electric_blue68

25 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did Gorsuch just signal intent to defend congressional power and authority in future rulings? [View all] bigtree Feb 20 OP

I can hardly believe it, but UpInArms Feb 20 #1

He certainly gave a history lesson. Buckeyeblue Feb 20 #5

reminding of the history of a king imposing taxes without representation bigtree Feb 20 #21

One can hope Tim S Feb 20 #2

amen bigtree Feb 20 #19

DURec leftstreet Feb 20 #3

nah. they're just trying to save B.See Feb 20 #4

there is a strong element of saving their own financial portfolios here bigtree Feb 20 #8

So, seems they know how to reference B.See Feb 20 #11

there were sly exploitations of relatively recent conservative doctrine by some of the majority bigtree Feb 20 #20

Armies of masked thugs deporting our best customers are bad for business Bluetus Feb 20 #6

Nope. Just says he values his wallet more than loyalty to Trump Raven123 Feb 20 #7

I agree with that bigtree Feb 20 #9

The problem is Gorsuch was one who agreed on the Trump immunity decision Raven123 Feb 20 #13

I get that bigtree Feb 20 #15

Or he's renegotiating lame54 Feb 20 #10

Only when big money is at stake. 617Blue Feb 20 #12

I agree on that bigtree Feb 20 #16

K&R UTUSN Feb 20 #14

Sadly the process also makes it very difficult to correct unintended consequences. dickthegrouch Feb 20 #17

Gorsuch addressed that, I think, by pointing to the 'major questions doctrine' bigtree Feb 20 #18

'btw' bigtree Saturday #22

It appears that 2 of the 3 TACO picks are THINKING on their butts! ProudMNDemocrat Saturday #23

My question then: why did the esteemed right-side of the Court . . . peggysue2 Saturday #24

it's the old adage, I think, about who's ox is gored bigtree Saturday #25