Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

OneCrazyDiamond

(2,068 posts)

2. It skips district judges?

Reply to MichMan (Reply #1)

Thu Mar 5, 2026, 09:53 PM

Mar 5

I dont know really. It's why I posted here. This is my go to spot for understanding articles like these. I think its district courts where the admin keeps getting smacked down on their draconian immigration enforcement.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Court unanimously sides with government in immigration dispute [View all] OneCrazyDiamond Mar 5 OP

How does it sidestep due process? MichMan Mar 5 #1

It skips district judges? OneCrazyDiamond Mar 5 #2

Why do you think all justices agreed 9-0 ? MichMan Mar 5 #3

I wouldnt even pretend to know, OneCrazyDiamond Mar 5 #4

Will this affect Judge Xinis' rulings? OneCrazyDiamond Mar 5 #5

I'm not sure, but I think Abrego Garcia's asylum case is still in process. pat_k Mar 5 #7

Thanks. OneCrazyDiamond Friday #8

I'm not sure what it means, particularly in light of the DOJ effectively turning the BIA into a dismissal factory. pat_k Mar 5 #6