Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dave says

(5,402 posts)
25. It's essentially a flat tax
Mon Mar 9, 2026, 09:51 PM
Monday

Let’s say the flat tax rate is 20% (I read some time back that at least 17% would be needed to match revenues, but it was without a $75k deductible).

So, the tax on a single taxpayer earning $100k would be $5000, or 5% of earnings. A taxpayer making $100,000,000 would pay $4,996,250, or 4.996% of earnings. Essentially we’re looking at a flat tax, not progressive in any meaningful sense. Quite a lot less than rich earned income is taxed now (it would be a bonanza of a tax break).

However, I might come on board if capital gains are treated like earned income, and if all the loopholes available to the very rich were closed. Plus eliminate the upper limit for social security tax. It might be better than what we have now.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No. Just no n/t leftstreet Monday #1
Why not? moose65 Monday #6
How about an explanation of your "no". Not real useful otherwise NoRethugFriends Monday #9
Tax higher incomes, slash pork spending leftstreet Monday #18
I don't know what neighborhood you live in.... SergeStorms Monday #20
That's not the effective rate for most leftstreet Monday #21
Yes please! at140 Monday #2
Squirrel! 50 Shades Of Blue Monday #3
Or to raise, or eliminate, the cap on Social Security displacedvermoter Monday #5
This instead. Ferrets are Cool Monday #13
THIS!☝️👆🖕 RainCaster Monday #30
Yes! Johnny2X2X Monday #4
No. No flat taxes moose65 Monday #8
No. Flat taxes are regressive NoRethugFriends Monday #10
It could be the trade off Johnny2X2X Monday #12
Why should somebody at 100,000 pay same rate as 1,000,000,000 NoRethugFriends Monday #15
They wouldn't Johnny2X2X Monday #16
It's essentially a flat tax Dave says Monday #25
Where the heck you getting your calculator? Johnny2X2X Monday #26
Oops! Dave says Monday #28
It's not perfect. Johnny2X2X Monday #29
I think they are trying to put things in place to counter AI. Basic income will be next. They will need billionaires Pisces Monday #7
"the proposal, which is guaranteed to be expensive, doesn't yet have a cost estimate" muriel_volestrangler Monday #11
Head of household generally means a single person with dependant household members resident at least 6 months if adult. haele Monday #22
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Monday #14
Stupid idea, rather than lower taxes we cut spending, specifically on the military. indusurb Monday #17
I'd rather actual tax policy that eliminates the cap on SS, raises taxes on wealthy and makes Nanjeanne Monday #19
Louder for the folks in the back... nt EarthFirst Monday #23
But what about the poor billionaires? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Monday #24
It'll go nowhere. Just look at the liberals here. DJ Synikus Makisimus Monday #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Booker Pushes Bill to Mak...»Reply #25