Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

chouchou

(3,090 posts)

32. I understand. (Woke up late) I'll still slap his face, just for fun.

Reply to vanessa_ca (Reply #28)

Tue Mar 10, 2026, 11:44 AM

Yesterday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

vanessa_ca AloeVera

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tucker Carlson: "Unconditional surrender means foreign troops get to rape your wife and daughter if they want [View all] BlueWaveNeverEnd Yesterday OP

Well Hogshit said there are no rules of engagement fujiyamasan Yesterday #1

Hard to believe there are Americans that talk like that Walleye Yesterday #2

It's becoming less hard to believe every day. LoisB Yesterday #31

To the victor, go the spoils UpInArms Yesterday #3

That's it... they think of war as a video game viva la Yesterday #4

That was the history of war long before video games EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #11

True UpInArms Yesterday #12

For starters . . . . . no_hypocrisy Yesterday #5

There was someone on DU recently saying that the victors never face war crimes, so "all good" maxrandb Yesterday #6

WTF? 2naSalit Yesterday #7

When dealing with a bag of rancid excrement... GiqueCee Yesterday #8

I like that imagery MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #35

How is that a 'truly unhinged' prediction ? vanessa_ca Yesterday #9

Because our American troops don't win and start raping Melon Yesterday #10

Mahmudiyah rape and killings CatWoman Yesterday #13

While Of Course Reprehensible, Five Soldiers Is A Pretty Small Sample. ColoringFool Yesterday #17

Look up US military civilian rape in Korea and Vietnam, just for starters. niyad Yesterday #39

Bullshit. It's a problem even during peacetime vanessa_ca Yesterday #15

Not What He Was Referencing, Though. ColoringFool Yesterday #18

But it is what I referenced in the post he replied to vanessa_ca Yesterday #19

That's not systematic rape.... Melon Yesterday #21

Look up US military civilian rape in Korea and Vietnam, for starters. niyad Yesterday #40

Because He Is Implying That Our WW2 Troops Raped And.... ColoringFool Yesterday #16

Oh they actually did. WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #22

While we certainly didn't do the rape thing anywhere near the scale of Russia indusurb Yesterday #23

Is Tucker in the files by chance? durablend Yesterday #14

This message was self-deleted by its author Renew Deal Yesterday #20

and they wonder why we women want the equal rights amendment ratified, when men resort to such thoughts lindysalsagal Yesterday #24

Rec'd, but just a note that Tucker had warned against starting this war and was warning about "unconditional surrender" vanessa_ca Yesterday #27

Oh context?!! Now there is a novel thought... AloeVera Yesterday #30

Exactly. It was a warning. vanessa_ca Yesterday #36

And Tucker will be around PlanetBev Yesterday #25

Even as a woman? ...Can I slap his God-Damn face 16 times via telephone? chouchou Yesterday #26

Why? He was warning against that happening if Trump pursued an "unconditional surrender" vanessa_ca Yesterday #28

I understand. (Woke up late) I'll still slap his face, just for fun. chouchou Yesterday #32

Haha, if only we could do it together at the same time. vanessa_ca Yesterday #34

"Your" wife, "your" daughter leftstreet Yesterday #29

Must be one of Tucker's main fantasies CanonRay Yesterday #33

Tucker always with the testicles Kid Berwyn Yesterday #37

OMG MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #38

Rape is, and always has been, one of the weapons of war, however niyad Yesterday #41

Living in a nation long overdue for a public conversation contrasting "historically normal" with "socially desirable" 0rganism Yesterday #42