Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,525 posts)
17. No. I am saying that **even if** we needed to prove citizenship
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 06:56 PM
18 hrs ago

The solution proposed is still not a solution because of the burden it imposes on anyone who has ever changed their name - or whose birth was not registered as a routine matter.

Proving citizenship to vote (the SAVE act) is utter nonsense. There is a miniscule number of non-citizens voting - every investigation verifies this. It is a non-problem. You proposed a way to address the non-problem - which does not actually address the problem with the SAVE act (even though it is not a problem in the first place).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fund local police departm...»Reply #17