Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bluetus

(2,850 posts)
16. Just to illustrate that point about curated LLMs
Sun Mar 29, 2026, 11:12 AM
Mar 29

Last edited Sun Mar 29, 2026, 08:41 PM - Edit history (1)

Lexis/Nexis has always been a leader in information resources for the legal profession. They offer Lexis+ AI, but are positioning it as an "assistant", trying to avoid blame when dipshit lawyers just hit the button and produce a brief without any proofreading. This is a very conservative position, but they are highly respected in the legal field, so that may work out.
https://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/products/lexis-plus.page

There are newcomers who are trying to position as "Lawyer-in-a-box". If they have done a good job of curation, then they might make take a big bite out of Lexis' share.

https://gc.ai
https://strongsuit.com/solutions/legal-research-ai/
and a bunch of others:
Thomson Reuters CoCounsel
MyCase
Harvey AI
Diligen
etc etc etc

These things are growing like weeds, but who knows what the quality is? A law firm can trash their reputation in a hurry if they use an AI product that puts out garbage.

But the point is, none of this business is going to Altman, Musk or any of the other crooks who are taking investors for billions of dollars to build vast data centers that may end up mostly unnecessary.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What if they... 2naSalit Mar 28 #1
It's like the fuckin tulip mania of the 1630's struggle4progress Mar 28 #2
Bingo. multigraincracker Mar 29 #13
AI can only copy what has been done edhopper Mar 28 #3
The layoffs ARE about AI. These companies have all pissed away hundreds of millions of dollars Bluetus Mar 29 #6
Just to illustrate that point about curated LLMs Bluetus Mar 29 #16
Deep expose. cachukis Mar 29 #28
Very well explained. Thanks. cachukis Mar 29 #27
I think that if an individual has some knowledge or expertise and asks the right questions that it can lead CentralMass Mar 29 #9
The difference is edhopper Mar 29 #15
I understand your point, but i think that people who think that they are safe from it are being overly optomistic. CentralMass Mar 29 #18
I don't think anyone is safe edhopper Mar 29 #20
Are psychologists relatively safe? Dave says Mar 29 #25
+! struggle4progress Mar 29 #12
It's a lot more nuanced than that. tinrobot Mar 29 #17
Yes edhopper Mar 29 #21
Codex is beyond that. It has special tools built into it to automate coding that go beyond just being trained... FascismIsDeath Mar 29 #22
I get that edhopper Mar 29 #24
When circumstances are forcing you to lay off people... hunter Mar 28 #4
A year from now: they'll be hiring people back to debug AI slop code. JHB Mar 28 #5
I'm not sure about that. From what I can tell, it is getting better and better. With a knowledgeable programmer working CentralMass Mar 29 #10
It seems to be a bit soft, but I suspect it's more gristle and chewy. haele Mar 29 #7
As an immersed peruser of history, I like your study cachukis Mar 29 #29
Meanwhile, companies are hiring human programmers to fix all the shit AI does sakabatou Mar 29 #8
An AI response to a related question. CentralMass Mar 29 #19
Yeah, who's going to organize your fantastic new army of agentic AI? Gonna do it all yourself, Sam? 0rganism Mar 29 #11
The models are learning from him IbogaProject Mar 29 #14
I agree, that is a concern, one only partially addressed by exclusively running locally. 0rganism Mar 29 #31
I see your point. But the scenario id that the compamy employs a small team of very skilled coders abd ir engineers who CentralMass Mar 29 #23
It's definitely an awful situation, but there's an up-side too 0rganism Mar 29 #30
Five to one, baby, one in five... OC375 Mar 29 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Futureism- Sam Altman Tha...»Reply #16