Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FascismIsDeath

(175 posts)
22. Codex is beyond that. It has special tools built into it to automate coding that go beyond just being trained...
Sun Mar 29, 2026, 05:21 PM
Sunday

...on code that others have written. Unfortunately, as a career coder myself, I see how powerful it is. But it also needs guidance. You still need people who can read code and review what its doing before you push that out to production. It makes mistakes and in the wrong hands, people have already done really stupid stuff with it.

The other silver lining here, for people like me, that don't want to be replaced with AI entirely... the cost is gonna level out. Right now, the big AI companies that specialize in code (like OpenAI and their Codex product), they are selling time tokens. But they are losing money on it because they are charging customers less than what it costs them. They are being propped up by venture capital. Eventually that becomes unsustainable and they'll have to raise prices, which will limit access.... which means coders shouldn't allow themselves to forget how to code just yet.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What if they... 2naSalit Saturday #1
It's like the fuckin tulip mania of the 1630's struggle4progress Saturday #2
Bingo. multigraincracker Sunday #13
AI can only copy what has been done edhopper Saturday #3
The layoffs ARE about AI. These companies have all pissed away hundreds of millions of dollars Bluetus Sunday #6
Just to illustrate that point about curated LLMs Bluetus Sunday #16
Deep expose. cachukis Sunday #28
Very well explained. Thanks. cachukis Sunday #27
I think that if an individual has some knowledge or expertise and asks the right questions that it can lead CentralMass Sunday #9
The difference is edhopper Sunday #15
I understand your point, but i think that people who think that they are safe from it are being overly optomistic. CentralMass Sunday #18
I don't think anyone is safe edhopper Sunday #20
Are psychologists relatively safe? Dave says Sunday #25
+! struggle4progress Sunday #12
It's a lot more nuanced than that. tinrobot Sunday #17
Yes edhopper Sunday #21
Codex is beyond that. It has special tools built into it to automate coding that go beyond just being trained... FascismIsDeath Sunday #22
I get that edhopper Sunday #24
When circumstances are forcing you to lay off people... hunter Saturday #4
A year from now: they'll be hiring people back to debug AI slop code. JHB Saturday #5
I'm not sure about that. From what I can tell, it is getting better and better. With a knowledgeable programmer working CentralMass Sunday #10
It seems to be a bit soft, but I suspect it's more gristle and chewy. haele Sunday #7
As an immersed peruser of history, I like your study cachukis Sunday #29
Meanwhile, companies are hiring human programmers to fix all the shit AI does sakabatou Sunday #8
An AI response to a related question. CentralMass Sunday #19
Yeah, who's going to organize your fantastic new army of agentic AI? Gonna do it all yourself, Sam? 0rganism Sunday #11
The models are learning from him IbogaProject Sunday #14
I agree, that is a concern, one only partially addressed by exclusively running locally. 0rganism Sunday #31
I see your point. But the scenario id that the compamy employs a small team of very skilled coders abd ir engineers who CentralMass Sunday #23
It's definitely an awful situation, but there's an up-side too 0rganism Sunday #30
Five to one, baby, one in five... OC375 Sunday #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Futureism- Sam Altman Tha...»Reply #22