Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

cachukis

(3,931 posts)

29. As an immersed peruser of history, I like your study

Reply to haele (Reply #7)

Sun Mar 29, 2026, 07:13 PM

8 hrs ago

of the layers. Our ancestors faced much of what we deal with today.
Have always wondered if they were just doing the best they can at the time they were doing it and we, despite or because of our insight, are doing the best we can.
Contemplation in the ruins, is fascinating.
I concur, we are in transformation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Futureism- Sam Altman Thanks Programmers for Their Effort, Says Their Time Is Over [View all] CentralMass Saturday OP

What if they... 2naSalit Saturday #1

It's like the fuckin tulip mania of the 1630's struggle4progress Saturday #2

Bingo. multigraincracker Yesterday #13

AI can only copy what has been done edhopper Saturday #3

The layoffs ARE about AI. These companies have all pissed away hundreds of millions of dollars Bluetus Yesterday #6

Just to illustrate that point about curated LLMs Bluetus 16 hrs ago #16

Deep expose. cachukis 8 hrs ago #28

Very well explained. Thanks. cachukis 8 hrs ago #27

I think that if an individual has some knowledge or expertise and asks the right questions that it can lead CentralMass Yesterday #9

The difference is edhopper 18 hrs ago #15

I understand your point, but i think that people who think that they are safe from it are being overly optomistic. CentralMass 10 hrs ago #18

I don't think anyone is safe edhopper 10 hrs ago #20

Are psychologists relatively safe? Dave says 9 hrs ago #25

+! struggle4progress Yesterday #12

It's a lot more nuanced than that. tinrobot 16 hrs ago #17

Yes edhopper 10 hrs ago #21

Codex is beyond that. It has special tools built into it to automate coding that go beyond just being trained... FascismIsDeath 9 hrs ago #22

I get that edhopper 9 hrs ago #24

When circumstances are forcing you to lay off people... hunter Saturday #4

A year from now: they'll be hiring people back to debug AI slop code. JHB Saturday #5

I'm not sure about that. From what I can tell, it is getting better and better. With a knowledgeable programmer working CentralMass Yesterday #10

It seems to be a bit soft, but I suspect it's more gristle and chewy. haele Yesterday #7

As an immersed peruser of history, I like your study cachukis 8 hrs ago #29

Meanwhile, companies are hiring human programmers to fix all the shit AI does sakabatou Yesterday #8

An AI response to a related question. CentralMass 10 hrs ago #19

Yeah, who's going to organize your fantastic new army of agentic AI? Gonna do it all yourself, Sam? 0rganism Yesterday #11

The models are learning from him IbogaProject 18 hrs ago #14

I agree, that is a concern, one only partially addressed by exclusively running locally. 0rganism 7 hrs ago #31

I see your point. But the scenario id that the compamy employs a small team of very skilled coders abd ir engineers who CentralMass 9 hrs ago #23

It's definitely an awful situation, but there's an up-side too 0rganism 8 hrs ago #30

Five to one, baby, one in five... OC375 8 hrs ago #26