General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I do not want to "move forward" after this era. [View all]LiberalLovinLug
(14,751 posts)John Kerry, Bill Clinton, whomever it uncovers. Go for it all.
I think you start with this because a bi partisan American appetite for investigating further political corruption since the infamous "suicide", will hinge on first finding massive dirt on Trump and others in his cabinet and supporters in regards to Epstein's island.
If you start with "russia russia russia" or some other angle and put the Epstein on the back burner, the RW social media, owned by RW operators, will flood their sites with propaganda to offset it, and rile up the R base against D's as doing retribution with fake indictments.
Only after you open a massive wound from that exposure, and while MAGA is in shock, can you do a sideways shift to re-examining all the corruption that is now going on in Trump's regime, and will be more palatable to his former base to swallow, and harder for FOX News to dispute