Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ificandream

(11,856 posts)
53. Last night, Paxton broke out every stereotype from the Trump book he could find.
Wed May 27, 2026, 06:29 PM
15 hrs ago

I especially noticed the one about how electing Talarico was a danger to everything his supporters believed in, using the trans and children endangered lies that Trump did. Which is funny considering Trump was a close friend of Epstein. Talarico needs to do what Democrats are usually hesitant to do -- kick him back just as hard. But the good thing here is he won't have to lie to do it.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes! leftieNanner 18 hrs ago #1
Yes, he must do many things at once senseandsensibility 18 hrs ago #3
It's a big ask of anyone peggysue2 16 hrs ago #41
Kick dalton99a 18 hrs ago #2
It is also important he confronts MAGA christianity about their bastardization of Christianity. travelingthrulife 18 hrs ago #4
I'm not particularly religious so maybe I'm not a good judge senseandsensibility 18 hrs ago #5
The distinction is between Christian Nationalism and Christianity. pat_k 16 hrs ago #30
That is a must-see for clarity. Festivito 13 hrs ago #65
That sermon put him on my radar at the end of 2023. pat_k 12 hrs ago #67
My thoughts exactly. That's why I've thought that Talarico was particularly needed at this time. summer_in_TX 16 hrs ago #42
Trump needed no defining leftstreet 18 hrs ago #6
Magas are and were a lost cause senseandsensibility 18 hrs ago #7
No. "MAGA" is mainly about 30 million Bluetus 18 hrs ago #11
Good points senseandsensibility 18 hrs ago #12
I would say Obama was elected to bring us a public option in healthcare questionseverything 17 hrs ago #22
But he hedged so much about it that he had no mandate. Bluetus 16 hrs ago #33
That's not true Mad_Machine76 15 hrs ago #50
That is not my recollection Bluetus 14 hrs ago #58
Here's a link from Wikipedia that appears to support my recollection of events Mad_Machine76 14 hrs ago #59
I don't deny that Lieberman screwed the pooch Bluetus 14 hrs ago #62
I believe, however, that it was near the end of the passage of the ACA Mad_Machine76 13 hrs ago #64
I am sure the truth lies somewhere in that region. Politics can be very ugly Bluetus 12 hrs ago #66
Disagree questionseverything 14 hrs ago #61
I still genuinely believe if the Dems had RAMMED Medicare for all Americans through in 2009, we never PatrickforB 16 hrs ago #36
The biggest problem is that we pay into Medicare throughout our spooky3 11 hrs ago #72
Nah, with all due respect, your post would have us all dancing at the end of the same string. PatrickforB 9 hrs ago #76
I suggest that you do some reading on the problems in our health care spooky3 9 hrs ago #78
+1 leftstreet 17 hrs ago #23
Not this again... lame54 16 hrs ago #43
+a zillion nt spooky3 11 hrs ago #71
Opportunity economy, middle class, small business, first-time house buyer subsidy, corporate price gouging, betsuni 9 hrs ago #77
FDR who said... mountain grammy 46 min ago #84
I thought Kamala ran an excellent campaign PatSeg 18 hrs ago #8
I remember marveling at how good Kamala was during the debates senseandsensibility 18 hrs ago #10
I agree that gender was against her PatSeg 15 hrs ago #52
You have to draw contrasts Bluetus 16 hrs ago #35
Except I would get rid of the 'fight hard' clause. My email box and mobile text fills up every day with dozens PatrickforB 16 hrs ago #40
Good point. Bluetus 14 hrs ago #56
Sorry for,having to say this, but.... reACTIONary 12 hrs ago #70
Maybe not the best strategy SomedayKindaLove 2 hrs ago #79
Step one for Congress is heal thyself (insider trading is legal?!) Soul_of_Wit 15 hrs ago #48
Yes, as long as the examples are totally legitimate PatSeg 14 hrs ago #55
IDK Lemon Lyman 18 hrs ago #9
They needed to speak more about what what people needed wnylib 16 hrs ago #24
Picking a convicted felon over competency is entirely because of not solving issues like housing and affordability (n/m) Soul_of_Wit 15 hrs ago #49
There's a bit more to it. wnylib 15 hrs ago #54
Here is exactly what I was talking about. wnylib 13 hrs ago #63
do not forget the double standard Skittles 18 hrs ago #13
Yes, in many ways that is the elephant in the room senseandsensibility 17 hrs ago #14
she always had to avoid looking like the "angry black woman" Skittles 17 hrs ago #17
It is a fact. Do we want to have our principles or do we want to win some elections so we can make these things right? Bluetus 16 hrs ago #38
The one (principles) does not deny the other (victory) Torchlight 15 hrs ago #47
It has so far. Bluetus 14 hrs ago #57
Three key failures that were incredibly frustrating to watch. pat_k 17 hrs ago #15
Kamala's problem was she was a woman. Just saying, people. Joinfortmill 17 hrs ago #16
Like it or not, negative ads and action works. Good for him. NNadir 17 hrs ago #18
Kamala should have challenged TSF to a polygraph test in the debates. Rhiagel 17 hrs ago #19
I worked for an attorney The Wizard 16 hrs ago #34
Research on polygraphs shows they are not sufficiently reliable, eg, see spooky3 11 hrs ago #74
He knew his client was lying to him The Wizard 1 hr ago #83
Nailed it orangecrush 17 hrs ago #20
The only reason Harris lost is that she isn't a white male. ananda 17 hrs ago #21
Thank you. /nt spudspud 16 hrs ago #26
Yeah. I can hear the complaints from the always anti-Democrat morons: Zelda_Orchid 16 hrs ago #27
Running for the Senate MineralMan 16 hrs ago #25
He is also being a white male... displacedvermoter 16 hrs ago #28
Every Democrat running for office needs to blast the republicOn party KS Toronado 16 hrs ago #29
Can we please not do this? Politicub 16 hrs ago #31
In LBJ's first run for Congress he The Wizard 16 hrs ago #32
Wow senseandsensibility 16 hrs ago #37
More corrupt than Trump? lame54 16 hrs ago #39
You don't define an opponent with a single interview. RandySF 15 hrs ago #44
I am not sure one can ever define an opponent especially one as creepy as his. Best to just constantly define yourself. efhmc 11 hrs ago #73
what she absolutely did not do that cost her votes yobrault1 15 hrs ago #45
Democrats need to be better at multitasking Soul_of_Wit 15 hrs ago #46
The DNC could learn something from this guy gay texan 15 hrs ago #51
Last night, Paxton broke out every stereotype from the Trump book he could find. ificandream 15 hrs ago #53
I see.... sheshe2 14 hrs ago #60
Ummm... Unca Jim 12 hrs ago #68
She called Trump an "unhinged and unstable" fascist ... oh wait, it's Kamala the Invisible, like all the betsuni 12 hrs ago #69
Lawrence asked a repuke style question painting Rep Talarico with the pro trans kids brush. Tbear 10 hrs ago #75
What? He isn't a Black woman? ananda 2 hrs ago #80
Its called branding Historic NY 2 hrs ago #81
I don't know, in those debates she pasted Trump pretty good bucolic_frolic 1 hr ago #82
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I see that James Talarico...»Reply #53