General Discussion

Bluetus

(3,129 posts)

56. Good point.

Wed May 27, 2026, 06:51 PM

15 hrs ago

It really shouldn't be too much to ask for the candidate to present SAMPLE LEGISLATION that they are prepared to introduce the first day on the job.

In a more perfect world, we would have a PARTY OPERATION that already had sample legislation ready to go for at least the top 10 issues. In a democracy, it is expected that some give and take will be required to push legislation beyond the finish line, but we should be demanding that they show us what they intend to fight for.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

calimary

88 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I see that James Talarico is doing something that Kamala did not [View all] senseandsensibility 20 hrs ago OP

Yes! leftieNanner 20 hrs ago #1

Yes, he must do many things at once senseandsensibility 19 hrs ago #3

It's a big ask of anyone peggysue2 17 hrs ago #41

Kick dalton99a 20 hrs ago #2

It is also important he confronts MAGA christianity about their bastardization of Christianity. travelingthrulife 19 hrs ago #4

I'm not particularly religious so maybe I'm not a good judge senseandsensibility 19 hrs ago #5

Agreed. I am not religious either. His voice is important. travelingthrulife 12 min ago #87

The distinction is between Christian Nationalism and Christianity. pat_k 17 hrs ago #30

That is a must-see for clarity. Festivito 15 hrs ago #65

That sermon put him on my radar at the end of 2023. pat_k 13 hrs ago #67

They aren't all Christian Nationalists though, many just have a really hateful interpretation travelingthrulife 10 min ago #88

My thoughts exactly. That's why I've thought that Talarico was particularly needed at this time. summer_in_TX 17 hrs ago #42

Trump needed no defining leftstreet 19 hrs ago #6

Magas are and were a lost cause senseandsensibility 19 hrs ago #7

No. "MAGA" is mainly about 30 million Bluetus 19 hrs ago #11

Good points senseandsensibility 19 hrs ago #12

I would say Obama was elected to bring us a public option in healthcare questionseverything 18 hrs ago #22

But he hedged so much about it that he had no mandate. Bluetus 17 hrs ago #33

That's not true Mad_Machine76 16 hrs ago #50

That is not my recollection Bluetus 15 hrs ago #58

Here's a link from Wikipedia that appears to support my recollection of events Mad_Machine76 15 hrs ago #59

I don't deny that Lieberman screwed the pooch Bluetus 15 hrs ago #62

I believe, however, that it was near the end of the passage of the ACA Mad_Machine76 15 hrs ago #64

I am sure the truth lies somewhere in that region. Politics can be very ugly Bluetus 13 hrs ago #66

Disagree questionseverything 15 hrs ago #61

I still genuinely believe if the Dems had RAMMED Medicare for all Americans through in 2009, we never PatrickforB 17 hrs ago #36

The biggest problem is that we pay into Medicare throughout our spooky3 12 hrs ago #72

Nah, with all due respect, your post would have us all dancing at the end of the same string. PatrickforB 10 hrs ago #76

I suggest that you do some reading on the problems in our health care spooky3 10 hrs ago #78

+1 leftstreet 18 hrs ago #23

Not this again... lame54 17 hrs ago #43

+a zillion nt spooky3 12 hrs ago #71

Opportunity economy, middle class, small business, first-time house buyer subsidy, corporate price gouging, betsuni 10 hrs ago #77

FDR who said... mountain grammy 2 hrs ago #84

I thought Kamala ran an excellent campaign PatSeg 19 hrs ago #8

I remember marveling at how good Kamala was during the debates senseandsensibility 19 hrs ago #10

I agree that gender was against her PatSeg 16 hrs ago #52

You have to draw contrasts Bluetus 17 hrs ago #35

Except I would get rid of the 'fight hard' clause. My email box and mobile text fills up every day with dozens PatrickforB 17 hrs ago #40

Good point. Bluetus 15 hrs ago #56

Sorry for,having to say this, but.... reACTIONary 13 hrs ago #70

Maybe not the best strategy SomedayKindaLove 4 hrs ago #79

Step one for Congress is heal thyself (insider trading is legal?!) Soul_of_Wit 16 hrs ago #48

Yes, as long as the examples are totally legitimate PatSeg 16 hrs ago #55

IDK Lemon Lyman 19 hrs ago #9

They needed to speak more about what what people needed wnylib 18 hrs ago #24

Picking a convicted felon over competency is entirely because of not solving issues like housing and affordability (n/m) Soul_of_Wit 16 hrs ago #49

There's a bit more to it. wnylib 16 hrs ago #54

Here is exactly what I was talking about. wnylib 15 hrs ago #63

do not forget the double standard Skittles 19 hrs ago #13

Yes, in many ways that is the elephant in the room senseandsensibility 19 hrs ago #14

she always had to avoid looking like the "angry black woman" Skittles 19 hrs ago #17

It is a fact. Do we want to have our principles or do we want to win some elections so we can make these things right? Bluetus 17 hrs ago #38

The one (principles) does not deny the other (victory) Torchlight 16 hrs ago #47

It has so far. Bluetus 15 hrs ago #57

Three key failures that were incredibly frustrating to watch. pat_k 19 hrs ago #15

Kamala's problem was she was a woman. Just saying, people. Joinfortmill 19 hrs ago #16

Like it or not, negative ads and action works. Good for him. NNadir 18 hrs ago #18

Kamala should have challenged TSF to a polygraph test in the debates. Rhiagel 18 hrs ago #19

I worked for an attorney The Wizard 17 hrs ago #34

Research on polygraphs shows they are not sufficiently reliable, eg, see spooky3 12 hrs ago #74

He knew his client was lying to him The Wizard 2 hrs ago #83

Nailed it orangecrush 18 hrs ago #20

The only reason Harris lost is that she isn't a white male. ananda 18 hrs ago #21

Thank you. /nt spudspud 18 hrs ago #26

Yeah. I can hear the complaints from the always anti-Democrat morons: Zelda_Orchid 18 hrs ago #27

Running for the Senate MineralMan 18 hrs ago #25

He is also being a white male... displacedvermoter 18 hrs ago #28

Every Democrat running for office needs to blast the republicOn party KS Toronado 18 hrs ago #29

Can we please not do this? Politicub 17 hrs ago #31

In LBJ's first run for Congress he The Wizard 17 hrs ago #32

Wow senseandsensibility 17 hrs ago #37

More corrupt than Trump? lame54 17 hrs ago #39

You don't define an opponent with a single interview. RandySF 17 hrs ago #44

I am not sure one can ever define an opponent especially one as creepy as his. Best to just constantly define yourself. efhmc 12 hrs ago #73

what she absolutely did not do that cost her votes yobrault1 17 hrs ago #45

Democrats need to be better at multitasking Soul_of_Wit 17 hrs ago #46

The DNC could learn something from this guy gay texan 16 hrs ago #51

Last night, Paxton broke out every stereotype from the Trump book he could find. ificandream 16 hrs ago #53

I see.... sheshe2 15 hrs ago #60

Ummm... Unca Jim 13 hrs ago #68

She called Trump an "unhinged and unstable" fascist ... oh wait, it's Kamala the Invisible, like all the betsuni 13 hrs ago #69

Lawrence asked a repuke style question painting Rep Talarico with the pro trans kids brush. Tbear 11 hrs ago #75

What? He isn't a Black woman? ananda 3 hrs ago #80

Its called branding Historic NY 3 hrs ago #81

I don't know, in those debates she pasted Trump pretty good bucolic_frolic 2 hrs ago #82

You have a point, especially after 45 years of incessant smearing of liberals lostnfound 47 min ago #85

Also bring up every time Old Crank 18 min ago #86