Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: What a total f*ck you [View all]

Hassin Bin Sober

(27,545 posts)
8. I did see they asked for a 12 hour extension and attest it will be done by early hours the 13th
Sat Jun 13, 2026, 01:13 AM
15 hrs ago
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.287972/gov.uscourts.dcd.287972.58.0_1.pdf


MOTION FOR TWELVE-HOUR EXTENSION TO
COURT’S JUNE 12 COMPLIANCE DEADLINE


Defendants respectfully request a brief extension of time to file the compliance declaration
required by this Court’s May 29, 2026 permanent-injunction order (see ECF No. 49), as one task—
the removal of signage from the Center’s front portico “that purports to rename the Kennedy
Center after President Trump,” id.—has been delayed because of thunderstorms in the District of
Columbia that presented safety concerns for workers.
See Ex. A. The removal work is presently
ongoing, and Defendants expect it will conclude in the early hours of the morning of June 13,
2026. Id. Defendants respectfully request a short extension of time—until noon on June 13, 2026—
to file their compliance declaration. Defendants reached out to Plaintiff when it became clear late
in the evening of June 12 that progress on removal of the letters had been sufficiently hindered to
threaten the midnight compliance deadline.

Plaintiff provided the following position statement:
Plaintiff’s position is that Defendants had two weeks to comply with the order, and
only need an extension because of their inexcusable delay. Plaintiff also has
concerns that this fits a patten of non-compliance on Defendants’ part. But under
the circumstances, Plaintiff takes no position on a 12 hour extension. Plaintiff
would strongly oppose any further extensions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What a total f*ck you»Reply #8