Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Electoral College gave us Trump in 2016. hlthe2b Wednesday #1
Totally disagree. House of Roberts Wednesday #2
I'm ok with you disagreeing. Really 31j20b3 Wednesday #13
The House provides the local representation that you wnylib Wednesday #48
In part, yes. But imagine 20 years of presidents with no appreciation 31j20b3 Wednesday #49
I disagree that the president will soon have the power to wnylib Wednesday #57
I think you may be in a dangerous delusion,THIS IS WHAT TRUMP IS DOING NOW 31j20b3 Wednesday #63
I have no delusions or illusions about the state we are in. wnylib Wednesday #67
Yep. bamagal62 Wednesday #52
Dirt doesn't vote Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #3
Better said than my more verbose attempt Bettie Wednesday #7
Rob Sand might well be your next governor DFW Wednesday #51
I sure hope so Bettie Yesterday #73
I share your assessment of him. DFW Yesterday #74
This message was self-deleted by its author DinahMoeHum 20 hrs ago #77
Josh Turek may be your next US Senator DinahMoeHum 20 hrs ago #78
True. But people who choose how to run a Representative Democracy must consider 31j20b3 Wednesday #17
I don't see how any of this addresses the problems with the "tyranny of the minority" Stargleamer Wednesday #50
Well the E. C. is hardly tyranny is it???? That seems like rather extreme hyperbole. 31j20b3 Wednesday #54
It can be if it brings about a tyranny. . . Stargleamer Wednesday #61
Your argument really obscures the power that your visions of equal representation in the Senate and guarantee of 1 31j20b3 Wednesday #66
Yes, TYRANNY is EXACTLY what it is. Hillary Clinton WON the niyad 18 hrs ago #83
Dirt shouldn't vote Freddie Wednesday #27
Exactly OnionPatch 19 hrs ago #81
Suspect you are new to the impact of elections on cachukis Wednesday #4
You're suspicion is actually quite flawed as most sweeping assumptions are 31j20b3 Wednesday #18
Just relying on your attitude about the electoral college cachukis Wednesday #19
Yes as in a sweeping over generalization 31j20b3 Wednesday #22
Regardless. The electoral college was set up, ultimately, cachukis Wednesday #31
Actually one vote means one vote. All votes equal. All politicians campaigning must reach all voters. Nanjeanne Wednesday #5
If slavery was the only idea behind the electoral college... but today it ISN'T 31j20b3 Wednesday #25
I outlined the 3 reasons. None are valid now IMHO. Rural voters would still need to be wooed. No Nanjeanne Wednesday #33
Nting sweeping assumptions here: "Rural life s built around harvesting and extracting resources," c-rational Wednesday #40
"Rural life is built around harvesting and extracting resources" . . . seriously? markpkessinger 16 hrs ago #92
Despite the majority of Americans who would like to change the electoral college, it will likely walkingman Wednesday #6
One citizen, one vote. Johonny Wednesday #8
Maybe. maybe not. 31j20b3 Wednesday #20
Is this a sweeping assumption? CivicGrief Wednesday #23
Mighty big assumption on your part. Phoenix61 Wednesday #24
I also totally disagree. Eliminating the electoral college means EVERY VOTE COUNTS. Now, only votes in a few swing Fil1957 Wednesday #9
"If the college were eliminated, candidates would visit many more states to get every vote they can." MichMan Wednesday #21
It's really not about candidates visiting, it's about what enters the national conversation 31j20b3 Wednesday #26
Yes they would, absolutely. It's true they wouldn't visit Montana or the Dakotas, but there are many states that are Fil1957 Wednesday #64
The republican college lame54 Wednesday #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Scrivener7 Wednesday #11
Since the change would require a MineralMan Wednesday #12
True, but practical imposition isn't my consideration 31j20b3 Wednesday #29
Then your subject is irrelevant. MineralMan Wednesday #32
It's a shame you think the national economy made up of all its parts is irrelevant 31j20b3 Wednesday #36
But i don't think that. MineralMan Wednesday #38
I support The 'National Popular Vote Interstate Compact' LetMyPeopleVote 16 hrs ago #89
The state of Virginia is the latest state to join the National Popular Vote Compact LetMyPeopleVote 16 hrs ago #90
Would force candidates to campaign all over the country instead of concentrating on swing state YorkRd Wednesday #14
UNfortunately that deflects things into the party competitions and thats a mistake 31j20b3 Wednesday #34
I don't think rural America has anything to worry about. BannonsLiver Wednesday #15
Also, rural areas tend to be dominated by a few wealthy white people. yardwork Wednesday #45
Each state has two Senators.... SergeStorms Wednesday #16
And each state must have at least one Congress person. 31j20b3 Wednesday #37
There's a compromise position. biocube Wednesday #28
Where do you find that information? MineralMan Wednesday #30
Rural America is grossly over represented in the Senate Bristlecone Wednesday #35
Idaho has the same power as the probably the 4th largest economy in the world. CA. Laughable. kairos12 Wednesday #60
the Electoral College served a purpose way back Skittles Wednesday #39
"...get the fuck rid of it" 3catwoman3 Wednesday #62
One Flaw In Your Logic... ProfessorGAC Wednesday #41
It doesn't matter what any of us think about the Electoral College. yardwork Wednesday #42
Land doesn't vote, people do obamanut2012 Wednesday #43
Yes saw that above, you can read my response from above. 31j20b3 Wednesday #44
If its a country by the people, for the people, then the majority of the people are who's in charge sboatcar Wednesday #46
No that can't really be allowed to stand. Places with small populations must be protected 31j20b3 Wednesday #56
The electoral college was a compromise to protect slave states. sboatcar 18 hrs ago #85
I agree. OC375 Wednesday #47
We're talking about people here, not "big cities" Stargleamer Wednesday #55
Yep OC375 Wednesday #65
I do. RandySF Wednesday #53
Dumping the electoral college doesn't eliminate representative government DFW Wednesday #58
I respectfully disagree. Congressional districts have an equal number of population. But each state gets 2 Senators. surfered Wednesday #59
So, the Senate should be abolished? MichMan Wednesday #68
No. We should go to a popular vote for President. It won't happen though without a Constitutional Amendment, which surfered Wednesday #70
I'm not sure that can be done The Revolution Wednesday #71
"Dumping the electoral college shifts democracy would great shift the influences of cities and metro-megalopoli"... GOOD FascismIsDeath Wednesday #69
It won't happen in any case The Revolution Wednesday #72
It should have been done away with 150 years ago. Emile 20 hrs ago #75
Citizens United is a bigger problem bucolic_frolic 20 hrs ago #76
Unfortunately, there are plenty of people who seem to think that some magic portal will open... OldBaldy1701E 20 hrs ago #79
White Supremacy / Apartheid is the main LuvLoogie 20 hrs ago #80
Trees don't vote. I'm sick of hearing about Middle America. I live in Middle America and always have lived rural. AZLD4Candidate 18 hrs ago #82
One of the problems with the electoral college... returnee 18 hrs ago #84
Bad Take, IMO. Happy Hoosier 17 hrs ago #86
I strongly disagree LetMyPeopleVote 17 hrs ago #87
When the system rewards losing more votes, democracy starts to look like a coin toss rigged from the start. LetMyPeopleVote 17 hrs ago #88
"shift the influences of cities and metro-megalopoli" - NO, it's shifts it more towards PEOPLE and not land themaguffin 16 hrs ago #91
I support the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact LetMyPeopleVote 16 hrs ago #93
Just to correct the figures muriel_volestrangler 16 hrs ago #94
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Americans mostly back dum...»Reply #8