Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Supreme Court will release opinions on Monday at 10 a.m. EDT. [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(71,824 posts)12. In Trump v. Cook, the vote is 5-4. Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Jackson join the chief justice.
Nora Collins
Mod
10:16 AM
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p
Cook: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a312_5468.pdf
Slaughter: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-332_qn12.pdf
Mod
10:16 AM
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p
Cook: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a312_5468.pdf
Slaughter: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-332_qn12.pdf
Amy Howe
Mod
10:18 AM
In Trump v. Cook, the vote is 5-4. Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Jackson join the chief justice.
At issue in this case is the Trump administrations efforts to fire Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserves Board of Governors, based on allegations of mortgage fraud (which she strenuously disputes). The lower courts required Trump to allow Cook to stay at the Fed while litigation continued, and the Supreme Court heard argument in January on whether to pause the lower courts decision.
At issue in this case is the Trump administrations efforts to fire Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserves Board of Governors, based on allegations of mortgage fraud (which she strenuously disputes). The lower courts required Trump to allow Cook to stay at the Fed while litigation continued, and the Supreme Court heard argument in January on whether to pause the lower courts decision.
The court today turns down the government's request to pause the lower court's decision -- e.g., Lisa Cook can continue to stay in office while the litigation continues.
Thomas has a dissenting opinion; Alito has a dissenting opinion joined by Gorsuch; Barrett also has a dissenting opinion.
David Lat
Mod
10:20 AM
"To accept any one of [the Trump administration's arguments would in effect transform the Federal Reserves for-cause protection into at-will employmentan interpretive leap out of step with the statute Congress enacted and our Nations tradition of central banking protected from political interference. We therefore deny the Governments application."
Amy Howe
Mod
10:20 AM
I was just about to type that, David. Thank you!
David LatMod replied David Lat
10:20 AM
"To accept any one of [the Trump administration's arguments would in effect transform the Federal Reserves more
There should be a closing bracket around "administration's."
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:20 AM
Wild card court here too.
David LatMod replied David Lat
10:21 AM
There should be a closing bracket around "administration's."
The Chief did not mention He Who Must Not Be Named.
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:21 AM
And how we will now separate "
independent" agencies that Congress can define, from others, will not get any easier. That is, if COngress ever starts again to enact careful legislation. Which right now looks doubtful.
Jason Noah
10:21 AM
5
Sorry, y'all, I'm a bit confused. Practically, what does the Slaughter decision mean? Does it allow the president to fire FTC commissioners for any reason?
Amy Howe
Mod
10:21 AM
1
"Having rejected the Government's view that the courts are to play no role in assessing the validity of a Governor's removal, we may decide this application on narrow grounds. No matter the precise definition of cause, or the scope of our review of any such determination, the President failed to afford Cook the procedural protections to which she was entitled by statute."
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:23 AM
So, like immigration? President can do as he pleases, BUT some minimal due process required?
Amy Howe
Mod
10:23 AM
6
From Slaughter -- "To 'discharg[e] the duties of his trust,' the President must have the assistance of officers he can trust. Although it is up to the Senate to decide whether to confirm those with whom the President would prefer to work, neither Congress nor the courts may saddle him with those with whom he cannot work. Subordinates who exercise the President's power are subject to removal by him."
2
We do not yet know about the last opinion day. Roberts is still reading from his opinions, which came from the PIO rubber-banded together.
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:24 AM
6
FDR and Taft are dancing together right now, somewhere....
David Lat
Mod
10:24 AM
4
In terms of their bottom lines at least, Slaughter and Cook came out as many expected. "The Fed is different" carried the day.
Amy Howe
Mod
10:25 AM
5
Roberts is still reading from Slaughter (h/t Chris Geidner).
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:25 AM
1
CA media just waking up. So I have a civilized TV appearance schedule today!
Amy Howe
Mod
10:26 AM
9
There are no more decisions coming today.
David LatMod replied Amy Howe
10:26 AM
1
We do not yet know about the last opinion day. Roberts is still reading from his opinions, which came from the PIO more
The Chief will let us know when the last day of the Term will be. Otherwise, the Marshal will tell us when the next opinion day is.
Amy Howe
Mod
10:26 AM
1
Justice Sotomayor is reading from her dissent in Slaughter.
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:27 AM
Sotomayor's third oral dissent this Term. Is that a record? At least recently?
Mod
10:18 AM
In Trump v. Cook, the vote is 5-4. Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Jackson join the chief justice.
At issue in this case is the Trump administrations efforts to fire Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserves Board of Governors, based on allegations of mortgage fraud (which she strenuously disputes). The lower courts required Trump to allow Cook to stay at the Fed while litigation continued, and the Supreme Court heard argument in January on whether to pause the lower courts decision.
At issue in this case is the Trump administrations efforts to fire Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserves Board of Governors, based on allegations of mortgage fraud (which she strenuously disputes). The lower courts required Trump to allow Cook to stay at the Fed while litigation continued, and the Supreme Court heard argument in January on whether to pause the lower courts decision.
The court today turns down the government's request to pause the lower court's decision -- e.g., Lisa Cook can continue to stay in office while the litigation continues.
Thomas has a dissenting opinion; Alito has a dissenting opinion joined by Gorsuch; Barrett also has a dissenting opinion.
David Lat
Mod
10:20 AM
"To accept any one of [the Trump administration's arguments would in effect transform the Federal Reserves for-cause protection into at-will employmentan interpretive leap out of step with the statute Congress enacted and our Nations tradition of central banking protected from political interference. We therefore deny the Governments application."
Amy Howe
Mod
10:20 AM
I was just about to type that, David. Thank you!
David LatMod replied David Lat
10:20 AM
"To accept any one of [the Trump administration's arguments would in effect transform the Federal Reserves more
There should be a closing bracket around "administration's."
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:20 AM
Wild card court here too.
David LatMod replied David Lat
10:21 AM
There should be a closing bracket around "administration's."
The Chief did not mention He Who Must Not Be Named.
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:21 AM
And how we will now separate "
independent" agencies that Congress can define, from others, will not get any easier. That is, if COngress ever starts again to enact careful legislation. Which right now looks doubtful.
Jason Noah
10:21 AM
5
Sorry, y'all, I'm a bit confused. Practically, what does the Slaughter decision mean? Does it allow the president to fire FTC commissioners for any reason?
Amy Howe
Mod
10:21 AM
1
"Having rejected the Government's view that the courts are to play no role in assessing the validity of a Governor's removal, we may decide this application on narrow grounds. No matter the precise definition of cause, or the scope of our review of any such determination, the President failed to afford Cook the procedural protections to which she was entitled by statute."
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:23 AM
So, like immigration? President can do as he pleases, BUT some minimal due process required?
Amy Howe
Mod
10:23 AM
6
From Slaughter -- "To 'discharg[e] the duties of his trust,' the President must have the assistance of officers he can trust. Although it is up to the Senate to decide whether to confirm those with whom the President would prefer to work, neither Congress nor the courts may saddle him with those with whom he cannot work. Subordinates who exercise the President's power are subject to removal by him."
2
We do not yet know about the last opinion day. Roberts is still reading from his opinions, which came from the PIO rubber-banded together.
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:24 AM
6
FDR and Taft are dancing together right now, somewhere....
David Lat
Mod
10:24 AM
4
In terms of their bottom lines at least, Slaughter and Cook came out as many expected. "The Fed is different" carried the day.
Amy Howe
Mod
10:25 AM
5
Roberts is still reading from Slaughter (h/t Chris Geidner).
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:25 AM
1
CA media just waking up. So I have a civilized TV appearance schedule today!
Amy Howe
Mod
10:26 AM
9
There are no more decisions coming today.
David LatMod replied Amy Howe
10:26 AM
1
We do not yet know about the last opinion day. Roberts is still reading from his opinions, which came from the PIO more
The Chief will let us know when the last day of the Term will be. Otherwise, the Marshal will tell us when the next opinion day is.
Amy Howe
Mod
10:26 AM
1
Justice Sotomayor is reading from her dissent in Slaughter.
Rory K. Little
Mod
10:27 AM
Sotomayor's third oral dissent this Term. Is that a record? At least recently?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Supreme Court will release opinions on Monday at 10 a.m. EDT. [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 29
OP
that would be asinine, but this court doesn't give a shit if anything makes sense.
themaguffin
Jun 29
#15
In Trump v. Cook, the vote is 5-4. Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Jackson join the chief justice.
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 29
#12
David Lat: We could have opinion days tomorrow, or tomorrow and Wednesday, or just Wednesday.
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 29
#14