Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cab67

(3,950 posts)
3. Not sure I agree.
Mon Jun 29, 2026, 01:08 PM
Jun 29

Yes, it has a mechanism to remove information. But more than once, I've corrected misinformation, only to have someone reverse it and report me for "vandalism."

In every case, I've corrected a page on the subject I study for a living. And I'm the vandal.

It's also worth reading up on what happened during the Amanda Knox case. The page on the case was taken over by foaming-at-the-mouth believers in Ms Knox's guilt, and any effort to add balance was deleted. The situation only improved when the CEO of Wikipedia, or someone like that, intervened.

I've learned to double check anything - and I mean anything - I get from Wikipedia.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hoofed crocodiles! And t...»Reply #3