Ohh That's Rich - birthright citizenship 6-3 to 5-4 ruling explained

[Ms. Toad]

15. That's not what he is saying.

What he is saying is that he agrees with the dissent that the constitution does not prohibit the limitations Trump wanted to impose. BUT - he disagrees with the dissent that the executive order is sufficient. He believes that there is a statutory prohibition for what Trump wanted to do. So to correct that, Congress needs to pass a law.

That law would not override the constitution (in his interpretation the constitution - as one of the 9 deciders of what the constitution actually says) - but would act within it to impose statutory limitations permitted by the constitution.

ETA: I hadn't watched the video before I wrote the above - but if you want a summary, rather than watching the video, it is essentially what the video says.