Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When AI can't even get simple things straight [View all]Wiz Imp
(10,951 posts)12. How do you know that it wasn't wrong?
https://futurism.com/the-byte/study-chatgpt-answers-wrong
https://joshbersin.com/2025/10/bbc-finds-that-45-of-ai-queries-produce-erroneous-answers/
BBC Finds That 45% of AI Queries Produce Erroneous Answers
This is mindblowing. Today the BBC and EBU (European Broadcasting Union) published a detailed study which shows that around 45% of AI news queries to ChatGPT, MS Copilot, Gemini, and Perplexity produce errors.
In other words, the dangerously self-confident AI systems we use are quite poor at giving us good analysis of news. While the study focused on news, this shows us that we have to be extremely careful when using and trusting these open corpus systems because they are answering questions based on faulty, exaggerated, outdated, or incorrect data.

Examples are quite astounding: the AIs incorrectly answered who is the Pope, who is the Chancellor of Germany, and in response to the question Should I be worried about the bird flu, Copilot claimed A vaccine trial is underway in Oxford. The source for this was a BBC article from 2006, almost 20 years old.
Some were potentially consequential errors on matters of law. Perplexity (CRo) claimed that surrogacy is prohibited by law in Czechia, when in fact it is not regulated by the law and is neither explicitly prohibited nor permitted. Gemini (BBC) incorrectly characterized a change to the law around disposable vapes, saying it would be illegal to buy them, when in fact it was the sale and supply of vapes which was to be made illegal.
Study Finds That 52 Percent of ChatGPT Answers to Programming Questions Are Wrong
In recent years, computer programmers have flocked to chatbots like OpenAIs ChatGPT to help them code, dealing a blow to places like Stack Overflow, which had to lay off nearly 30 percent of its staff last year.
The only problem? A team of researchers from Purdue University presented research this month at the Computer-Human Interaction conference that shows that 52 percent of programming answers generated by ChatGPT are incorrect.
Thats a staggeringly large proportion for a program that people are relying on to be accurate and precise, underlining what other end users like writers and teachers are experiencing: AI platforms like ChatGPT often hallucinate totally incorrectly answers out of thin air.
For the study, the researchers looked over 517 questions in Stack Overflow and analyzed ChatGPTs attempt to answer them.
We found that 52 percent of ChatGPT answers contain misinformation, 77 percent of the answers are more verbose than human answers, and 78 percent of the answers suffer from different degrees of inconsistency to human answers, they wrote.
In recent years, computer programmers have flocked to chatbots like OpenAIs ChatGPT to help them code, dealing a blow to places like Stack Overflow, which had to lay off nearly 30 percent of its staff last year.
The only problem? A team of researchers from Purdue University presented research this month at the Computer-Human Interaction conference that shows that 52 percent of programming answers generated by ChatGPT are incorrect.
Thats a staggeringly large proportion for a program that people are relying on to be accurate and precise, underlining what other end users like writers and teachers are experiencing: AI platforms like ChatGPT often hallucinate totally incorrectly answers out of thin air.
For the study, the researchers looked over 517 questions in Stack Overflow and analyzed ChatGPTs attempt to answer them.
We found that 52 percent of ChatGPT answers contain misinformation, 77 percent of the answers are more verbose than human answers, and 78 percent of the answers suffer from different degrees of inconsistency to human answers, they wrote.
https://joshbersin.com/2025/10/bbc-finds-that-45-of-ai-queries-produce-erroneous-answers/
BBC Finds That 45% of AI Queries Produce Erroneous Answers
This is mindblowing. Today the BBC and EBU (European Broadcasting Union) published a detailed study which shows that around 45% of AI news queries to ChatGPT, MS Copilot, Gemini, and Perplexity produce errors.
In other words, the dangerously self-confident AI systems we use are quite poor at giving us good analysis of news. While the study focused on news, this shows us that we have to be extremely careful when using and trusting these open corpus systems because they are answering questions based on faulty, exaggerated, outdated, or incorrect data.

Examples are quite astounding: the AIs incorrectly answered who is the Pope, who is the Chancellor of Germany, and in response to the question Should I be worried about the bird flu, Copilot claimed A vaccine trial is underway in Oxford. The source for this was a BBC article from 2006, almost 20 years old.
Some were potentially consequential errors on matters of law. Perplexity (CRo) claimed that surrogacy is prohibited by law in Czechia, when in fact it is not regulated by the law and is neither explicitly prohibited nor permitted. Gemini (BBC) incorrectly characterized a change to the law around disposable vapes, saying it would be illegal to buy them, when in fact it was the sale and supply of vapes which was to be made illegal.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
AI makes mistakes, but it has been life-changing for me in many ways. I feel lucky to
Doodley
Thursday
#4
Like any tool, understanding it has limits and weaknesses is important, but so is in seeing where its strengths are.
Doodley
Friday
#15
Had the same experience as Moniss with Copilot. I asked a question that I was
allegorical oracle
Friday
#32
In my experience, it is more efficient in some areas than any human being. It has a depth of
Doodley
Friday
#14
To be fair, the consumer available versions pale in comparison with those used in industry.
harumph
Thursday
#7