Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(10,951 posts)
12. How do you know that it wasn't wrong?
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 08:27 PM
Thursday
https://futurism.com/the-byte/study-chatgpt-answers-wrong
Study Finds That 52 Percent of ChatGPT Answers to Programming Questions Are Wrong
In recent years, computer programmers have flocked to chatbots like OpenAI’s ChatGPT to help them code, dealing a blow to places like Stack Overflow, which had to lay off nearly 30 percent of its staff last year.

The only problem? A team of researchers from Purdue University presented research this month at the Computer-Human Interaction conference that shows that 52 percent of programming answers generated by ChatGPT are incorrect.

That’s a staggeringly large proportion for a program that people are relying on to be accurate and precise, underlining what other end users like writers and teachers are experiencing: AI platforms like ChatGPT often hallucinate totally incorrectly answers out of thin air.

For the study, the researchers looked over 517 questions in Stack Overflow and analyzed ChatGPT’s attempt to answer them.

“We found that 52 percent of ChatGPT answers contain misinformation, 77 percent of the answers are more verbose than human answers, and 78 percent of the answers suffer from different degrees of inconsistency to human answers,” they wrote.

https://joshbersin.com/2025/10/bbc-finds-that-45-of-ai-queries-produce-erroneous-answers/
BBC Finds That 45% of AI Queries Produce Erroneous Answers
This is mindblowing. Today the BBC and EBU (European Broadcasting Union) published a detailed study which shows that around 45% of AI news queries to ChatGPT, MS Copilot, Gemini, and Perplexity produce errors.

In other words, the “dangerously self-confident” AI systems we use are quite poor at giving us good analysis of news. While the study focused on news, this shows us that we have to be extremely careful when using and trusting these “open corpus” systems because they are answering questions based on faulty, exaggerated, outdated, or incorrect data.

Examples are quite astounding: the AI’s incorrectly answered “who is the Pope,” “who is the Chancellor of Germany,” and in response to the question “Should I be worried about the bird flu”, Copilot claimed “A vaccine trial is underway in Oxford”. The source for this was a BBC article from 2006, almost 20 years old.

“Some were potentially consequential errors on matters of law. Perplexity (CRo) claimed that surrogacy “is prohibited by law” in Czechia, when in fact it is not regulated by the law and is neither explicitly prohibited nor permitted. Gemini (BBC) incorrectly characterized a change to the law around disposable vapes, saying it would be illegal to buy them, when in fact it was the sale and supply of vapes which was to be made illegal.”

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

spending billions of dollars... RussBLib Thursday #1
Most of us could get all the lies we moniss Thursday #2
Call me simple minded, Faux pas Thursday #3
I think that's a bit short sighted... Happy Hoosier Friday #25
AI makes mistakes, but it has been life-changing for me in many ways. I feel lucky to Doodley Thursday #4
Did AI Write that? unweird Thursday #6
wonder how much here is AI text? RussBLib Thursday #11
I use ChatGPT every day. Have you ever tried it? Doodley Friday #16
I have tested it extensively, Ms. Toad Friday #18
No, but again I ask unweird Friday #20
Why? Mossfern Friday #29
I'm with your nephew! I love chatting with AI. anciano Friday #30
AI isn't perfect, but what is? anciano Thursday #5
The problem is that the information being given moniss Thursday #8
"often factually wrong".... anciano Thursday #9
How do you know that it wasn't wrong? Wiz Imp Thursday #12
Like any tool, understanding it has limits and weaknesses is important, but so is in seeing where its strengths are. Doodley Friday #15
Old info ThreeNoSeep Friday #26
🙄💤 Bye! Wiz Imp Friday #27
so have you rigorously researched the responses to be sure they are accurate? RussBLib Thursday #13
Have you done the research to back that up? Ms. Toad Friday #19
Had the same experience as Moniss with Copilot. I asked a question that I was allegorical oracle Friday #32
efficient? Wiz Imp Thursday #10
In my experience, it is more efficient in some areas than any human being. It has a depth of Doodley Friday #14
I believe that the people who knock it haven't discovered its potential. Doodley Friday #17
That is nonsense. Ms. Toad Friday #22
To be fair, the consumer available versions pale in comparison with those used in industry. harumph Thursday #7
Yeah... Hong Kong Cavalier Friday #21
It is downright dangerous for the general population Ms. Toad Friday #24
It's important to remember... Happy Hoosier Friday #23
"(which is what humans are supposedly good at)" Wiz Imp Friday #28
There are different types of LLMs and most do have extensive reasoning capabilities. They can 'think.' Appendix Friday #33
Hard disagree. Happy Hoosier Friday #34
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Saturday #35
The AI helping REAL Doctors with medical research and Diagnosis LostOne4Ever Friday #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When AI can't even get si...»Reply #12