General Discussion

DemocracyForever

(403 posts)

31. It's called actual facts

Sat Jul 4, 2026, 12:06 PM

Saturday

like the fact that the U.S. constitution doesn't give the SCOTUS the authority that the SCOTUS has taken over the centuries through a judicial coup. Marbury vs Madison is the 1st example of the SCOTUS judicial coup.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ohh That's Rich - birthright citizenship 6-3 to 5-4 ruling explained [View all] Figarosmom Wednesday OP

Kavanaugh doesn't understand the constitution DemocracyForever Wednesday #1

Or he was trying to give trump Figarosmom Wednesday #2

Congressional law can never override the constitution DemocracyForever Wednesday #3

They can always pass a law to give the Supreme Court another shot to get it "right". Ilikepurple Wednesday #8

It would need to be a legal move DemocracyForever Thursday #13

I never said reconsider the case. An actual law could be rightly challenged and reach the Supreme Court. Ilikepurple Thursday #14

Again, Congressional law can't override the constitution. DemocracyForever Thursday #17

What would you be saying if the numbers for this case were reversed? Ilikepurple Thursday #20

The 14th amendment is clear DemocracyForever Friday #21

This is still just an opinion and one that doesn't carry the force of law if the Supreme Court decides otherwise. Ilikepurple Friday #25

It's called actual facts DemocracyForever Saturday #31

Congressional laws can never overturn the constitution DemocracyForever Thursday #18

"What's a constitution?" - Brett NameAlreadyTaken Wednesday #4

The U.S. constitution DemocracyForever Wednesday #7

That's not what he is saying. Ms. Toad Thursday #15

It's not accurate DemocracyForever Thursday #16

The constitution is only as clear as those designated to interpret say it is. Ms. Toad Thursday #19

"All persons" is clear DemocracyForever Friday #22

Four of the people who we have charged with deciding what the constitution means disagree with you. Ms. Toad Friday #23

I'm amazed by the tongue twisting DemocracyForever Friday #24

I'm not sure who you are arguing against in this thread. Ilikepurple Friday #27

Are you saying the children of foreign diplomats Ms. Toad Friday #28

So don't believe your eyes? DemocracyForever Saturday #29

I am United States attorney Ms. Toad Saturday #37

NAACP Legal Defense Fund chair disagrees with you DemocracyForever Sunday #38

Under current law, yes. Ms. Toad Sunday #39

It's clearly what Kavanaugh meant DemocracyForever Monday #40

No, it's not what he means. Ms. Toad Monday #41

In your world 2+25 DemocracyForever 21 hrs ago #42

In n other words, you either haven't read the opinions Ms. Toad 14 hrs ago #43

Congress can pass an amendment to override................... Lovie777 Wednesday #5

Congress can pass a constitutional amendment DemocracyForever Saturday #30

Aren't these meat stuffed robes supposed to be legal geniuses?? NoMoreRepugs Wednesday #6

Onlookers astonished by JD Vance's latest attempt to dunk on Pope Leo: 'Excommunicate him' CNYHarris Wednesday #9

From a quote from an unpublished piece on the internet CNYHarris Wednesday #10

We must protect the native born on planets in the galaxy. CNYHarris Wednesday #11

TLDR Mossfern Friday #26

From AI CNYHarris Saturday #32

What the article does prove CNYHarris Saturday #33

This message was self-deleted by its author CNYHarris Saturday #35

AI final take on the article/work CNYHarris Saturday #36

More the truth is stronger than fiction CNYHarris Saturday #34

vance and crew are not free market capitalists. Figarosmom Wednesday #12