Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(55,640 posts)
32. Thanks. And when I was wrong on an OP years ago that had 100 plus recs, I made another OP admitting I was wrong.
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 10:26 PM
8 hrs ago

There rarely is accountability (especially at a reputational level) nor the self-admittance of error in re the multitude of false (often major) claims over the years. That goes for posters who continue to push the debunked claims after they have been debunked or simply moving on to other feel-good but false claims.

Debunking things or simply disagreeing on things that many people WANT to be true, things that align with their wishes, is a thankless task, as people do not take well to having a personal ox gored.

2 perfect examples are

1. The continuing 'This Will Hold'-style BlueAnon 2024 election denialism (with the denialist claims also being an attack on Biden and Harris, as people making the claims are, by their own logic, saying that Biden and Harris were either too inept to stop it despite having thousands of legal and election professionals in their resource quiver, and/or were in on the steal themselves).

and then

2. The tortured-logic-employing and ultimately false claims and attempts to try and paint the Charlie Kirk assassin (Tyler Robinson) as a RW MAGAt.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is it Mitch or is it AI? [View all] struggle4progress Sunday OP
My thought also! kimbutgar Sunday #1
It is not AI, see post 15 Celerity 23 hrs ago #16
That's a very good question. rickyhall Sunday #2
Lol! mwmisses4289 Sunday #3
Oh, I just saw something from X FullySupportDems Sunday #4
The image on the right was a couple of months ago. CrispyQ Sunday #10
I can't make much from that, his expressions are different FullySupportDems Yesterday #11
Really? I think he looks very different! Like at least a few years worth of difference. CrispyQ 20 hrs ago #22
I didn't mean to disregard your impression FullySupportDems 19 hrs ago #24
I think it's more that I'm at that age where I notice big changes over short amounts of time. CrispyQ 17 hrs ago #26
The only thing in life you can count on is change FullySupportDems 15 hrs ago #30
No, see post 15. The fake is the so called 2023 pic. Celerity 23 hrs ago #17
Fake 2003 photos Random Boomer 23 hrs ago #20
He looks awfully perky. badhair77 Sunday #5
No matter how long I stare at him, he doesn't move struggle4progress Sunday #6
amazing how media fall for this without having live video with an independent third party there msongs Sunday #7
Yeah, typed "statement", weird picture. orthoclad Sunday #8
Graham confirms LessAspin Sunday #9
All joking and internet sleuthing aside.. LessAspin Yesterday #12
This message was self-deleted by its author hookaleft Yesterday #14
You are wrong. The AI pic is the so-called 2023 pic. I have posted on this multiple times. Celerity 23 hrs ago #15
So sorry. It fooled me. hookaleft 23 hrs ago #18
It's obviously a fake if you look at it critically Random Boomer 23 hrs ago #21
How did they do that??? hookaleft 23 hrs ago #19
Are we saying that the "2023" photo is actually AI Bluetus 17 hrs ago #27
You'd think a US Senator and his wife could afford more than one shirt each. Hugin 19 hrs ago #25
The so-called 2023 pic (the pool pic) is an OpenAI construct, as I have shown with a link to back that up. Celerity 15 hrs ago #29
I always rely on your background research, Celerity. Hugin 8 hrs ago #31
Thanks. And when I was wrong on an OP years ago that had 100 plus recs, I made another OP admitting I was wrong. Celerity 8 hrs ago #32
Fuck that turtle-faced crumb bum. He's a shitty MAGA turd. Piss on that fucking turd. SoFlaBro Yesterday #13
Regardless. If he is well enough to be in rehab he's well enough for a couple independent sources to visit him Buckeyeblue 20 hrs ago #23
Andy Borowitz would never, ever, publish any AI crap! Brother Buzz 17 hrs ago #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it Mitch or is it AI?»Reply #32