Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Glenn Greenwald ain't no Libertarian, Part 2: Wall Street [View all]madfloridian
(88,117 posts)15. He posted his stances that are FAR from libertarian in nature. Here they are..
Greenwald tried to defend himself, but it's made no difference here. The same 5 or 6 keep on repeating over and over and over that he's a libertarian.
It annoys the hell out of me. It's childish. He may not be especially likable, he may be critical of Obama....but he is not a libertarian.
Here are some of his views that a libertarian would not have... in his own words.
here are views I've publicly advocated. Decide for yourself if the "libertarian" label applies:
* opposing all cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (here and here);
* repeatedly calling for the prosecution of Wall Street (here, here and here);
* advocating for robust public financing to eliminate the domination by the rich in political campaigns, writing: "corporate influence over our political process is easily one of the top sicknesses afflicting our political culture" (here and here);
* condemning income and wealth inequality as the by-product of corruption (here and here);
* attacking oligarchs - led by the Koch Brothers - for self-pitying complaints about the government and criticizing policies that favor the rich at the expense of ordinary Americans (here);
* arguing in favor of a public option for health care reform (repeatedly);
* criticizing the appointment of too many Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street officials to positions of power (here, here and here);
* repeatedly condemning the influence of corporate factions in public policy making (here and here);
* using my blog to raise substantial money for the campaigns of Russ Feingold and left-wing/anti-war Democrats Normon Solomon, Franke Wilmer and Cecil Bothwell, and defending Dennis Kucinich from Democratic Party attacks;
* co-founding a new group along with Daniel Ellsberg, Laura Poitras, John Cusack, Xeni Jardim , JP Barlow and others to protect press freedom and independent journalism (see the New York Times report on this here);
* co-founding and working extensively on a PAC to work with labor unions and liberal advocacy groups to recruit progressive primary challengers to conservative Democratic incumbents (see the New York Times report on this here);
So just bring it on. I have decided that if I want to continue to post here after 12 years of doing so responsibly I will have to accept that some here will pick apart every word, every source, every link. Some will continue to watch for my every post to rip it apart. Some will tolerate no criticism of the president, which is a dangerous thing for this country.
My usual disclaimer...my late hubby and I worked for, donated to, and campaigned for Obama in 2008 and 2012.
I do not approve of some of his policies at all. I will say so. So you will just have to nitpick.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If my memory serves I think he said he was shocked that CEO's would put their own
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#73
He's sure not left of center, he's an opportunist who'll use anyone to make a buck... been there
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#6
Wait, all people who write for a living, all political pundits eg, are OPPORTUNISTS?
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#7
Strawman, no one indicated all writers were. GGs a leach, every time he and his homeboy get busted
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#8
Yeah, I was trying to think of a 'lie' Greenwald has told and can't think of any offhand. He HAS
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#12
The strawman is the one you built. A political writer is contacted by a source with material
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#10
That would explain it. But you have to wonder what good it all is, it isn't working now that people
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#61
Of course, that too. I can't think of anyone I know who is buying the 'we're just collecting and
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#86
Ah, thanks for the explanation, I was having a hard time getting answers to my questions!
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#66
Good point, according to that poster EVERYONE who writes a book and promotes it, is a 'leach'.
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#17
Moyers' show is one of the few on TV trying to inform Americans, rather than cheerlead
merrily
Jun 2014
#48
Our Government is violating our Constitutional rights, that is a fact that most on the Left
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#60
He posted his stances that are FAR from libertarian in nature. Here they are..
madfloridian
Jun 2014
#15
Thanks MF, it won't make a difference for people with an agenda, for everyone else, it will and has.
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#21
Luckily, Libertarianism (or not) has nothing to do with whether the info disclosed is true (or not).
merrily
Jun 2014
#50
They ARE on our side, they are a threat to those whose agenda is to protect the status quo who also
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#87
1 of his smearers keep insisting that he went on a CATO tour. Yes, he went on that tour as a liberal
Luminous Animal
Jun 2014
#41
This subthread is like watching the monkey cage at the zoo. Shit is being slung.
Comrade Grumpy
Jun 2014
#63