Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
15. He posted his stances that are FAR from libertarian in nature. Here they are..
Wed Jun 4, 2014, 12:41 AM
Jun 2014

Greenwald tried to defend himself, but it's made no difference here. The same 5 or 6 keep on repeating over and over and over that he's a libertarian.

It annoys the hell out of me. It's childish. He may not be especially likable, he may be critical of Obama....but he is not a libertarian.

Here are some of his views that a libertarian would not have... in his own words.


here are views I've publicly advocated. Decide for yourself if the "libertarian" label applies:

* opposing all cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (here and here);

* repeatedly calling for the prosecution of Wall Street (here, here and here);

* advocating for robust public financing to eliminate the domination by the rich in political campaigns, writing: "corporate influence over our political process is easily one of the top sicknesses afflicting our political culture" (here and here);

* condemning income and wealth inequality as the by-product of corruption (here and here);

* attacking oligarchs - led by the Koch Brothers - for self-pitying complaints about the government and criticizing policies that favor the rich at the expense of ordinary Americans (here);

* arguing in favor of a public option for health care reform (repeatedly);

* criticizing the appointment of too many Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street officials to positions of power (here, here and here);

* repeatedly condemning the influence of corporate factions in public policy making (here and here);

* using my blog to raise substantial money for the campaigns of Russ Feingold and left-wing/anti-war Democrats Normon Solomon, Franke Wilmer and Cecil Bothwell, and defending Dennis Kucinich from Democratic Party attacks;

* co-founding a new group along with Daniel Ellsberg, Laura Poitras, John Cusack, Xeni Jardim , JP Barlow and others to protect press freedom and independent journalism (see the New York Times report on this here);

* co-founding and working extensively on a PAC to work with labor unions and liberal advocacy groups to recruit progressive primary challengers to conservative Democratic incumbents (see the New York Times report on this here);


So just bring it on. I have decided that if I want to continue to post here after 12 years of doing so responsibly I will have to accept that some here will pick apart every word, every source, every link. Some will continue to watch for my every post to rip it apart. Some will tolerate no criticism of the president, which is a dangerous thing for this country.

My usual disclaimer...my late hubby and I worked for, donated to, and campaigned for Obama in 2008 and 2012.

I do not approve of some of his policies at all. I will say so. So you will just have to nitpick.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

the critics must have gotten Tuesday night off... grasswire Jun 2014 #1
Perhaps they've realized their strategy was absurd MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #4
Exactly billhicks76 Jun 2014 #38
K & R! RufusTFirefly Jun 2014 #2
Why would a Libertarian be for Wall Street? joshcryer Jun 2014 #3
Why would they want to prosecute bankers? MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #5
Libertarians would prosecute bankers behind faulty loans. joshcryer Jun 2014 #14
Would Greenspan want bankers prosecuted? nt MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #36
Greenspan shifted from being a gold standard kook. joshcryer Jun 2014 #42
If my memory serves I think he said he was shocked that CEO's would put their own rhett o rick Jun 2014 #73
Yeah, here's the video, 40 years of wrong ideology. joshcryer Jun 2014 #74
Believing that the government works hand in hand with Wall Street is merrily Jun 2014 #49
No, really? joshcryer Jun 2014 #76
That was not the point. merrily Jun 2014 #89
Yes it was. joshcryer Jun 2014 #90
You're telling me what my point was? That's always fun merrily Jun 2014 #91
He's sure not left of center, he's an opportunist who'll use anyone to make a buck... been there uponit7771 Jun 2014 #6
Wait, all people who write for a living, all political pundits eg, are OPPORTUNISTS? sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #7
Strawman, no one indicated all writers were. GGs a leach, every time he and his homeboy get busted uponit7771 Jun 2014 #8
Example? MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #9
Yeah, I was trying to think of a 'lie' Greenwald has told and can't think of any offhand. He HAS sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #12
It's certainly an interesting dynamic. MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #16
+1. n/t scruboak Jun 2014 #54
The strawman is the one you built. A political writer is contacted by a source with material sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #10
I Can billhicks76 Jun 2014 #39
That would explain it. But you have to wonder what good it all is, it isn't working now that people sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #61
Well Said billhicks76 Jun 2014 #71
Of course, that too. I can't think of anyone I know who is buying the 'we're just collecting and sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #86
Yes Aerows Jun 2014 #64
Ah, thanks for the explanation, I was having a hard time getting answers to my questions! sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #66
I know. Aerows Jun 2014 #67
All authors promote their books, including Obama and both Clintons. merrily Jun 2014 #11
Elizabeth Warren's promoting her book MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #13
What did you think about her cheering Bill's bankruptcy actions? joshcryer Jun 2014 #18
Huh? MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #20
I take it you haven't read her book? joshcryer Jun 2014 #22
Part way through the audiobook. MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #24
She says nice things about HRC fighting "that awful bill." joshcryer Jun 2014 #25
Oh yeah, that. MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #28
HRC did a good old Obama-style abstention. joshcryer Jun 2014 #30
Are you SERIOUSLY Aerows Jun 2014 #78
Nah, just that she's no more left than Mark Udall. joshcryer Jun 2014 #80
LMAO Aerows Jun 2014 #81
I voted for Udall. joshcryer Jun 2014 #82
I voted for President Obama twice. Aerows Jun 2014 #83
Who says you can't object to anything? joshcryer Jun 2014 #84
Good point, according to that poster EVERYONE who writes a book and promotes it, is a 'leach'. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #17
Moyers' show is one of the few on TV trying to inform Americans, rather than cheerlead merrily Jun 2014 #48
Our Government is violating our Constitutional rights, that is a fact that most on the Left sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #60
OMG Just because Glenn Greenwald isn't a big fan of Obama... Rockyj Jun 2014 #70
He posted his stances that are FAR from libertarian in nature. Here they are.. madfloridian Jun 2014 #15
Disagreement is one thing MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #19
Thanks MF, it won't make a difference for people with an agenda, for everyone else, it will and has. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #21
"Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid" joshcryer Jun 2014 #29
Oh lordy... madfloridian Jun 2014 #32
Tell me about it... joshcryer Jun 2014 #33
Um no... Luminous Animal Jun 2014 #43
What Libertarian is against prosecuting thieves? joshcryer Jun 2014 #45
Okay. Luminous Animal Jun 2014 #46
I'm saying the views aren't inconsistent with Libertarianism. joshcryer Jun 2014 #47
Luckily, Libertarianism (or not) has nothing to do with whether the info disclosed is true (or not). merrily Jun 2014 #50
Are you saying the six things you posted are consistent with Libertarianism? Autumn Jun 2014 #57
From a later post, I'd say he is. But that spooky3 Jun 2014 #72
The same ones billhicks76 Jun 2014 #40
It appears the NSA protagonists AgingAmerican Jun 2014 #23
Sure is strange. MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #26
Or they ran out of popcorn... AgingAmerican Jun 2014 #27
Yep. And haven't quite nailed it yet. Luminous Animal Jun 2014 #44
K&R woo me with science Jun 2014 #31
Brilliant Oilwellian Jun 2014 #34
Your observations are devastating. vlakitti Jun 2014 #35
As a worker they are on MY side - TBF Jun 2014 #51
They ARE on our side, they are a threat to those whose agenda is to protect the status quo who also sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #87
Goddamn kicked and fucking rec'd. Fuddnik Jun 2014 #37
1 of his smearers keep insisting that he went on a CATO tour. Yes, he went on that tour as a liberal Luminous Animal Jun 2014 #41
Never mind.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #52
Sounds pretty damning MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author ProSense Jun 2014 #55
Does this make Hillary a Libertarian? Mnpaul Jun 2014 #65
Oh noes!! Ron Wyden exposed as a Libertarian as well Mnpaul Jun 2014 #69
Wow, I didn't know that the ACLU was libertarian! AgingAmerican Jun 2014 #88
Greenwald: Ron Paul most "anti-crony-capitalism" candidate ProSense Jun 2014 #56
yep they ignore all evidence because its hero worship! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #58
So. Fucking. Transparent. hootinholler Jun 2014 #59
Greenwald is a snivil libertarian. n/t Whisp Jun 2014 #62
This subthread is like watching the monkey cage at the zoo. Shit is being slung. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 #63
Thank You For Sharing cantbeserious Jun 2014 #68
Let's see, if he can get his digs in, he's agin' it. ucrdem Jun 2014 #75
I'm waiting for declarations Aerows Jun 2014 #77
They're not? MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #79
Moyers has gone so far left he's right! raouldukelives Jun 2014 #92
k/r - with great pleasure. 840high Jun 2014 #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Glenn Greenwald ain't no ...»Reply #15