Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Rebl2

(16,527 posts)

31. Seems like

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Sat Jun 7, 2025, 04:27 PM

Jun 7

he said that a couple months ago too.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Newsom floats withholding federal taxes as Trump threatens California [View all] highplainsdem Jun 6 OP

I'm starting to think secession shouldn't be off table. Of course, would have to move from my rube red state. Silent Type Jun 6 #1

Trump is trying to start a civil war it looks like. Irish_Dem Jun 7 #26

Aren't those taxes paid by individual taxpayers to the US Treasury? MichMan Jun 6 #2

Not all - there are federal excise taxes on alcoholic beverages for example DBoon Jun 7 #3

and paying into the CA system (however that works?) stopdiggin Jun 7 #8

There could be an escrow account for us Tumbulu Jun 7 #4

which would disallow the federal gov from presenting me with the bill? stopdiggin Jun 7 #7

In time, yes Tumbulu Jun 7 #14

agree with about 90% stopdiggin Jun 7 #17

About damned time! flying-skeleton Jun 7 #5

"Maybe it's time to cut that off" could be a campaign slogan. PermatexNo.2 Jun 7 #6

Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Jun 7 #22

Thanks. I'll try to behave. Or, failing that, at least try to use good grammar and punctuation. PermatexNo.2 Jun 8 #34

great talking point! but as a practical matter ... stopdiggin Jun 7 #9

California can make a case for "No taxation without Representation" thought crime Jun 7 #10

That would mean that a Wyoming taxpayer would pay $66 dollars in income taxes for every $1 a California resident pays MichMan Jun 7 #12

No, that would be Absurd. And Wyoming having the same level of representation as CA is just as Absurd. thought crime Jun 7 #16

the point (fairly obviously) - is that 'no taxation without representation' stopdiggin Jun 7 #18

Have you ever heard the slogan "no taxation without representation"? thought crime Jun 7 #20

and my post pointed to the fact that your quote stopdiggin Jun 7 #21

Happens all the time with city income taxes MichMan Jun 7 #25

CA has a LOT more Reps in the House. The founders worked out a reasonable balance Attilatheblond Jun 7 #28

It should have more Senators too, and some of the founders knew it. thought crime Jun 7 #29

Ah, yes, tranny of the majority. Nope that isn't a good way to govern. Attilatheblond Jun 7 #30

The Tyranny of the Majority is a problem. thought crime Jun 8 #33

We have 2 legislative bodies. One by population and one where all states have two members Attilatheblond Jun 8 #35

But they are represented. Igel Jun 7 #24

Newsom's argument also falls flat if you take it down to a local level MichMan Jun 7 #27

What would Gov Newsom's response be if for example Beverly Hills and Bel Air decided to withhold all their state taxes? MichMan Jun 7 #11

So you support Taco cutting off services to California? Scrivener7 Jun 7 #32

""Maybe it's time to cut that off," he added." Maybe just "redirect" the tax money to areas tfg cut? nt mitch96 Jun 7 #13

Sounds like a plan! Fla Dem Jun 7 #15

Yup, just maybe time, Newsom. republianmushroom Jun 7 #19

I did not think he was speaking about income tax. quaint Jun 7 #23

Seems like Rebl2 Jun 7 #31

Do it orangecrush Jun 8 #36