Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(20,466 posts)

8. Kagan voted for this?

Fri Jun 20, 2025, 01:03 PM

Jun 20

From the article:

Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the decision.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fuel firms can challenge California's emission limits, supreme court rules [View all] BumRushDaShow Jun 20 OP

California does have another tool they can moniss Jun 20 #4

Yeah, fuck the poor and working class The Mouth Jun 20 #6

I understand about working people The Mouth Jun 22 #14

You still don't understand how an excise tax can be structured to moniss Jun 22 #15

Wow. There is ALWAYS another step lower to go. SupportSanity Jun 20 #5

Kagan voted for this? Polybius Jun 20 #8

That was my first thought Miguelito Loveless Jun 20 #9

Once in a while, she votes with the conservatives Polybius Jun 20 #10

Compared to Sotomayor and Jackson BumRushDaShow Jun 20 #11

So, "financial harm" is more important than physical harm ? Nigrum Cattus Jun 20 #13