Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(180,171 posts)
16. Two late Trump court defeats 'could make a big difference in 2026': analyst
Fri Dec 26, 2025, 05:28 PM
Dec 2025

Maybe SCOTUS is not going to give trump everything he wants

Two late Trump court defeats 'could make a big difference in 2026': analyst

Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2025-12-26T20:01:22.528Z

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-cpourt-loss/

Two significant legal setbacks for Donald Trump's administration are likely to have substantial implications as the president enters 2026.

According to former White House correspondent Brian Karem, the Trump administration's winning streak with the conservative Supreme Court ended abruptly when the court blocked the president's attempt to deploy the National Guard to cities on a whim and as a show of force. A separate defeat came when a federal court rejected administration efforts to revoke security clearances from Trump critics.....

The Supreme Court's ruling represented a rare rebuke of the administration. Trump had argued in an October appeal that violence directed at Department of Homeland Security agents conducting immigration enforcement operations in Chicago justified deploying the National Guard.

"The conservative Supreme Court didn’t buy it," he wrote.

According to the decision, "At this preliminary stage, the Government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois." The court noted there was no legal basis for overriding the Posse Comitatus Act, which severely restricts the use of U.S. military forces within the United States.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Was about to hit "post" BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 #1
It is extremely rare when I manage to beat you LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #2
I was in the middle of washing up stuff from making cookie dough BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 #4
Here is a link to the ruling LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #3
This looks like a 6-3 BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 #6
"In doing so, the court at least provisionally REJECTED the Trump administration's view... Septua Dec 2025 #5
What about the USSC popsdenver Dec 2025 #14
can't believe i'd ever be saying this but Takket Dec 2025 #7
Precisely. If he can't mobilize the Guard against imagined acts of insurrection in the streets . . . Journeyman Dec 2025 #10
From Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker: LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #8
What?! The SCOTUS said, "No, Donny!!"? RussBLib Dec 2025 #9
I wish I wasn't shocked by SCOTUS issuing a reasonable opinion. TomSlick Dec 2025 #11
Dear Leader will NOT be pleased. Screw him Callie1979 Dec 2025 #12
'Hugely consequential': Experts say Supreme Court just wrecked Trump's plans LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #13
Everyone keeps calling this a Christmas miracle but technically it's a Festivus miracle, iykyk LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #15
Two late Trump court defeats 'could make a big difference in 2026': analyst LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #16
NYT-How a Scholar Nudged the Supreme Court Toward Its Troop Deployment Ruling (gift article) LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rejects Tru...»Reply #16