Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(105,732 posts)
6. Yeah, that reads like the first stage of a cover-up, not a "full investigation"
Sun Jan 25, 2026, 02:07 PM
Sunday

It starts by putting all the blame on named political enemies of the NRA, despite Walz not being involved, and lying that he "incites violence". It talks about "law enforcement officers" (the problem here is these officers are breaking the law, in all kinds of ways) "simply trying to do their jobs" ("I was only obeying orders" is no excuse or defence). Note the passive "have ended in violence", without noting the violence was committed by the federal authorities.

Then we use the weasel-word (OK, phrase) "officer-involved shooting", as if it's unclear who shot, and who was killed. "There will be a robust and comprehensive investigation" - this is not a call for an independent investigation, just an assumption that there will be a "comprehensive" one. They talk about whether "force" (this was not just "force" - "force" was the federal officer pushing the woman to the ground. This was "lethal force", ie killing was justified). They again blame "political voices", rather than the federal organisation that just killed someone.

This is just a careful restatement of the Trump position, with moderate language rather than unhinged accusations.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The NRA assumes there will be an investigation Soul_of_Wit Sunday #1
Too late for any real, trustworthy investigation. ICE/Noem/Bondi already botched any chance via evidence handling Attilatheblond Sunday #2
Let's not go & throw any parades for the NRA just yet... Earth Bound Misfit Sunday #3
Exactly, they're simply looking out for the interests of manufacturers of these deadly weapons. groundloop Sunday #4
The NRA told the GOVERNOR Of A State he should have no role in law enforcement delisen Sunday #5
Yeah, that reads like the first stage of a cover-up, not a "full investigation" muriel_volestrangler Sunday #6
The NRA is only getting concerned because the murdered man was carrying a legal concealed weapon. patphil Sunday #7
I'll take this ... IF true. stopdiggin Sunday #8
Where I grew up they would call this "fuckin' bullshit". twodogsbarking Sunday #9
Icesickles in hell orangecrush Sunday #10
I'm really glad they are standing up for this. NH Ethylene Sunday #11
They are not quakerboy Sunday #12
But for many NRA members, this is a real conundrum. intheflow Monday #17
if the nra actually listened too or cared about its members quakerboy Monday #18
Fuck Bill Essayli too IcyPeas Sunday #13
The NRA only cares about MAGA and Republican's guns. hadEnuf Sunday #14
Yet , it is always the autocrat that takes their guns. travelingthrulife Monday #20
Well, at least they are sticking to principles. I accept any help to force ICE to stand down. Martin68 Sunday #15
I can see why they're pissed jmowreader Monday #16
Protecting the 'precious, holy gun.' travelingthrulife Monday #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NRA and pro-gun groups ca...»Reply #6