Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ol Janx Spirit

(792 posts)
16. With the First Amendment, the Constitution envisions a "fourth estate" in specifically granting...
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 10:06 AM
Tuesday

...freedom of "the press." This power was intended to wield political influence and help--with the assistance of the freedom of speech, religion, assembly, and the right to petition--be a check on the government by "we the people."

The media has decided over the last 250 years that its job is not to wield this power of influence, but to merely report the "news."

This is in large part the fault of journalism becoming a profession taught in schools that demanded journalists not allow themselves to be "part of the story." This ethos created the bothsideserism we find in the MSM today. Journalists are taught to speak through interviewing others; and to always get the "other side" of a story.

There are ways in which this has served us well, but it has gutted the concept of a fourth estate intended to keep the government in check.

So now a fifth estate is emerging: bloggers, independent journalists, and citizens with phone cameras. This fifth estate isn't tiptoeing around anything, but it is also subject to the blustery winds of easy to create and disseminate disinformation.

The question is: will any of it now be able to keep this government in check?

Even the founders envisioned a US government that would outright lie to the American people, but did they envision a population that would accept it with a shrug? Probably not.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I hate the "appears to contradict " crap UpInArms Tuesday #1
I think some of them do that so they don't get sued for defamation BumRushDaShow Tuesday #2
It is still bullshit UpInArms Tuesday #4
Oh I know BumRushDaShow Tuesday #8
Yes, that's exactly it. They don't want to get sued. ificandream Tuesday #27
Looks like my fifty years of saying this is finally getting a following. twodogsbarking Tuesday #3
As they damned well should be. raccoon Tuesday #5
The billionaires own the media and the media's job bronxiteforever Tuesday #6
Too many news outlets take a mealy-mouthed approach to their reporting dlk Tuesday #7
It's about protecting their butts from a libel suit. ificandream Tuesday #28
Kick dalton99a Tuesday #9
I guess they think there are still enough people without internet access to get away with it. mdbl Tuesday #10
Faux watchers are bizarrre. They have it tuned in 24/7 and louder than loud. Clouds Passing Tuesday #13
NBC too. Gaytano70 Tuesday #11
When I watch broadcast news JPK Tuesday #21
Fear and favor both hey GusBob Tuesday #12
'federal immigration agents' Mr.Bee Tuesday #14
I never imagined, back when I read the Times enigmania Tuesday #15
We've been through that before BumRushDaShow Tuesday #20
With the First Amendment, the Constitution envisions a "fourth estate" in specifically granting... Ol Janx Spirit Tuesday #16
"it appears to be" "democrats say" "as she claims" mountain grammy Tuesday #17
File this under "No shit, Sherlock." nt Wednesdays Tuesday #18
Just found out??? Old Crank Tuesday #19
True, but I think it's gotten worse since Schlump took office again ... or at least it feels worse. ShazzieB Tuesday #25
"Tiptoe" is one way of putting it. Kid Berwyn Tuesday #22
The government is flat out lying, something the press refuses to say Miguelito Loveless Tuesday #23
Spinocchio presstitutes... BattleRow Tuesday #24
Rachel Called them out last night too johnnyplankton Tuesday #26
Par for the course. Aussie105 Wednesday #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Major news outlets under ...»Reply #16