Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(14,256 posts)
9. Can't under International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)
Fri May 1, 2026, 08:08 PM
May 1

It is only those tariffs imposed under IEEPA that were deemed illegal.

Here is Gemini's list of possible alternative authorities.

Imposing tariffs under one of the first two would certainly be challenged by somebody because there is no factual basis for the rationale. And since he's threatening 25% tariffs, he can't use the third.

Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962: This provision allows the president to impose tariffs if imports threaten national security. Trump has previously used this for steel/aluminum and is, as of May 2026, pivoting to this, as detailed in this Wikipedia article, to target specific sectors.

Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974: This gives the president authority to act against unfair foreign trade practices.

Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974: This allows for temporary (up to 150 days) import duties of up to 15% to address balance-of-payments issues, such as large trade deficits.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I thought the courts decided that El Bloat-O cannot impose tariffs - only congress. Marie Marie May 1 #1
shitstain could never read past 3rd grade, at most. dave99 May 1 #2
Republicans have never been ones to obey the law, and Democrats very seldomly hold them accountable LiberalArkie May 1 #3
"Republicans have never been ones to obey the law, and Democrats very seldomly hold them accountable" BumRushDaShow May 1 #7
I wasn't really thinking of now as much as in the past LiberalArkie May 2 #14
How far "in the past"? BumRushDaShow May 2 #15
Probably at least the Reagan administration. Dismantling public health, housing. The tax cuts, the LiberalArkie May 2 #17
During Raygun BumRushDaShow May 2 #18
Can't under International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) pat_k May 1 #9
hes already used the thirrd one worldwide moonshinegnomie May 1 #13
SCOTUS said it was unconstitutional to use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs. Ms. Toad May 1 #11
what trade deal did they violate and how did they violate it? ChicagoTeamster May 1 #4
The marmalade shartcannon is just butthurt.... Brother Buzz May 1 #5
He wanted them to lose ships, troops, and aircraft as well as lose money in the strait of Hormuz ChicagoTeamster May 1 #6
Well--how can Trump acuse The European Comm. of not folling the trade deal when the USSC said no dice??? riversedge May 1 #8
This! "Deal" extorted by tariff imposed illegally is void. pat_k May 1 #10
Someone must have mentioned the Epstein files. n/t flvegan May 1 #12
Is this another direct order from Putin? notKeith May 2 #16
He gets itchy to impose tariffs same as he gets itchy to start wars struggle4progress May 2 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump says he'll place 25...»Reply #9