Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 94 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme court's Voting Ri...»Reply #10
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

In reply to the discussion: Supreme court's Voting Rights Act ruling cited misleading data from DoJ [View all]

TheRickles

(3,499 posts)
10. I'm sure the decision was pre-determined, but I'm curious what the numbers would've looked like
Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Fri May 8, 2026, 12:22 PM
23 hrs ago

if the caveats mentioned by BumRush in the last paragraph had been taken into account.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Multichromaticdave99
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme court's Voting Rights Act ruling cited misleading data from DoJ [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP
His mind was already made up................. Lovie777 Yesterday #1
He had a conclusion already determined. All he needed was manipulated data Baitball Blogger Yesterday #3
My first thought, too... IthinkThereforeIAM Yesterday #4
John Roberts Lied...........he has been a racists POS since Reagan he lied when he got confirmed turbinetree Yesterday #2
I thought Roberts was W's POS lawyer spewing venom to get the FL recount stopped. GreenWave Yesterday #5
You see, THIS is the scary part. These six FUCKERS can rule their way for ANY reason, and bluestarone Yesterday #6
we can can cancel them dave99 18 hrs ago #19
Racism didn't end, white voters just got lazy and didn't vote in same % Attilatheblond Yesterday #7
You mean trumps DOJ supplied misleading republianmushroom 23 hrs ago #8
GIGO yankee87 23 hrs ago #9
I'm sure the decision was pre-determined, but I'm curious what the numbers would've looked like TheRickles 23 hrs ago #10
Try reading the linked article. There are graphs and plenty of numbers. It's quite damning. TheRickles 22 hrs ago #11
The Guardian "ran the numbers" and their findings are in the article BumRushDaShow 22 hrs ago #12
Very clear results, thanks. TheRickles 21 hrs ago #13
Yeah I saw after I posted because I was taking some time to do screenshots of the plots BumRushDaShow 21 hrs ago #14
No worries. That was me responding to me, BTW. I was a bit hasty in asking for more info. TheRickles 20 hrs ago #15
I know BumRushDaShow 20 hrs ago #16
They don't care...I know I'm snarky, but they don't. The only good news: LeftInTX 20 hrs ago #17
Alito would have found another lie to support his predetermined conclusion: honor 0: lie 1 Augiedog 19 hrs ago #18
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme court's Voting Ri...»Reply #10
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2026 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.