Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,340 posts)
38. MaddowBlog-Silent no more, Jack Smith calls out Trump's 'corrupted' Justice Department
Sun May 10, 2026, 03:38 PM
May 10

The prosecutor wasn’t able to make his case in court, but months later, he’s bringing his arguments to the public in forceful and unrestrained ways.

Silent no more, Jack Smith calls out Trump’s ‘corrupted’ Justice Department www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Ian Kremer (@wolverinebear.bsky.social) 2026-05-08T01:11:29.817Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/silent-no-more-jack-smith-calls-out-trumps-corrupted-justice-department

But nearly a year and a half later, the former special counsel has made the transition from a lawyer who preferred silence to one who has quite a bit to say. The New York Times reported:

Jack Smith, the special counsel who twice indicted President Trump, accused the Justice Department of having been “corrupted” by Trump loyalists he claimed were demolishing its credibility and seeking to undermine the rule of law.

Mr. Smith’s remarks, made last month in a private discussion at the Cosmos Club in Washington, represented his sharpest criticism of the department since leaving his post early last year
.


We have a Department of Justice today that targets people for criminal prosecution simply because the president doesn’t like them,” Smith said in the hourlong discussion on April 20, according to a video obtained by the Times that was shared with attendees. He added, “We have a department that fails to move on cases because they might uncover facts that are inconvenient to narratives the president would like to press.”.....

Soon after, during an interview with former prosecutor Andrew Weissmann at the University College London, Smith condemned Republican criticisms of his work as “ludicrous,” adding, “I think the attacks on public servants, particularly nonpartisan public servants — I think it has a cost for our country that is incalculable, and I think that we — it’s hard to communicate to folks how much that is going to cost us.”

More recently, Smith also delivered private and public testimony before the GOP-led House Judiciary Committee, which also didn’t do his Republican detractors any favors.

Smith was not able to make his case in court, but with increasing frequency, he’s bringing his arguments to the public in forceful and unrestrained ways.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Don't tease us... Funtatlaguy May 10 #1
I Agree, Endless Teasing & Not Much Action WiVoter May 10 #18
He can't unilaterally decide to release the evidence InstantGratification May 10 #31
I believe the time is coming when an avalanche of previously withheld and/or hidden liberalla May 10 #33
I hope you're right. calimary May 11 #45
"...material that could prove damaging to the president." J_William_Ryan May 10 #2
Why has this information NOT been released to the public already? Bluetus May 10 #6
Much of it was sealed by Judge Cannon Nt Fiendish Thingy May 10 #35
She can't seal the world. Bluetus May 10 #40
She sealed his report Fiendish Thingy May 10 #41
It might persuade some voters to vote differently in November. BadgerMom May 11 #44
Bring it on, Jack Smith! Let's hear all of it ... unredacted FakeNoose May 10 #3
Just think. relogic May 10 #7
He needs a safety switch. multigraincracker May 10 #16
All that information popsdenver May 10 #21
Don't hold your breath, not goona happen. Btw, source is raw story. msfiddlestix May 10 #36
Not when it's published in the New York Times first ... Raw Story is reprinting the NYT story FakeNoose May 10 #37
Did Raw Story actually republish the New York Times story, or did they write a version with a certain spin that stretche msfiddlestix May 11 #47
Do it! sheshe2 May 10 #4
If he has further evidence, he should release it. JohnnyRingo May 10 #5
Mueller orangecrush May 10 #8
Why wait????? The way to stop a predator is to strike first and hard. Ford_Prefect May 10 #9
Don't think this is the man trump wants to mess with. republianmushroom May 10 #10
Ewwwww Just Jerome May 10 #20
Why not? The old one sin't working too good: 3Hotdogs May 10 #26
Why "private" is part of the title? What am I missing? question everything May 10 #11
He is a private individual now, no longer employed by the public/government. nt SunSeeker May 10 #13
The remarks were made in private? liberalla May 10 #25
A private event. Invited guests only I would surmise. AZ8theist May 10 #27
Mr. Smith should hire bodyguards Bayard May 10 #12
It's not just popsdenver May 10 #22
Is that a bone spur report? generalbetrayus May 10 #14
I've often wondered why Trump has not had to deal with leaks Nixie May 10 #15
He is insulated popsdenver May 10 #24
SOMEONE has to have some guts and get the truth out. johnnyplankton May 10 #17
I believe that Jack Smith has the integrity to do it FakeNoose May 10 #42
So why didn't he release it before the presidential election?? mucifer May 10 #19
He would have been breaking the law FakeNoose May 10 #43
If he's prosecuted for illegally investigating trump radical noodle May 10 #23
Jack Smith has something BAD on Donald. Joinfortmill May 10 #28
So he'll drop this stuff only to help himself? johnp3907 May 10 #29
Just do it. Piecemeal it if you want but just get it out thete Deuxcents May 10 #30
At first I thought Jack Smith had enlisted in the army with the rank of Private Redleg May 10 #32
More Raw Story bullshit.... reACTIONary May 10 #34
MaddowBlog-Silent no more, Jack Smith calls out Trump's 'corrupted' Justice Department LetMyPeopleVote May 10 #38
Jack Smith Calls the Justice Dept. 'Corrupted' by Trump and His Allies (NYT gift article) LetMyPeopleVote May 10 #39
Jack Smith.... MarcoZandrini May 11 #46
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Private Jack Smith remark...»Reply #38