Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(173,180 posts)
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 06:40 AM 10 hrs ago

US officials downplay text of the Iran agreement, saying it doesn't account for back-channel commitments [View all]

Source: CNN Politics

PUBLISHED Jun 16, 2026, 6:50 PM ET


US negotiators are working to quickly release the text of the agreement between Washington and Tehran, even as they downplay the significance of the specific language in the document, US officials told CNN.

The officials described the text of the agreement as incredibly vague, mainly intended to create a more favorable environment for the highly technical, in-person talks to come. They added that the framework is aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience.

Additionally, the officials said that the text of the memorandum of understanding — which Vice President JD Vance told CNN Monday is one-and-a-half pages long — didn’t reflect critical back-channel commitments Iran has made to the US, which they argued gave them more confidence in signing on to the arrangement.

“People shouldn’t read too much into the language of the MOU,” one of the officials said, describing the agreement as a “political document.”

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/16/politics/iran-agreement-text-trump



“People shouldn’t read too much into the language of the MOU,” one of the officials said, describing the agreement as a “political document.”


Meaning it's non-existent.
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pay-offs for the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 9 hrs ago #1
I'm pretty sure a few countries in the Middle East are very uneasy................ Lovie777 9 hrs ago #2
I mean, they're on the hook for $300 billion and have a full-fledged economic competitor Prairie Gates 8 hrs ago #12
"The framework is aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience." Really? sop 9 hrs ago #3
More like Trump is trying to sell it to his internal audience. Baitball Blogger 9 hrs ago #5
Projection. They're trying to spin it for people here. ananda 8 hrs ago #9
Back channel commitments. Baitball Blogger 9 hrs ago #4
.... yardwork 9 hrs ago #6
So, all that for stock options? OldBaldy1701E 9 hrs ago #7
" aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically" Strelnikov_ 8 hrs ago #8
It's giving secret girlfriend in NIagara Falls Prairie Gates 8 hrs ago #10
In my honest opinion, Mtnmama 8 hrs ago #11
I.O.W.s The agreement gives Iran everything it wanted and 300 billion in reparations for Trump's war ... Botany 8 hrs ago #13
It is not "reparations". It is a "private investment fund". AloeVera 7 hrs ago #20
I might be wrong but @ the end of day the U.S. taxpayers will be on the hook for paying for Trump's war. Botany 6 hrs ago #21
Of course they are. One of the many, many reasons to not rush into an unnecessary, trumped-up war of choice. AloeVera 6 hrs ago #25
Another worthless document from the dumpie administration. KS Toronado 8 hrs ago #14
Back channel commitments?All that matters is what is actually signed,and with Trump,half the time even that won't matter thesquanderer 8 hrs ago #15
Everything Trump for 10+ years has gotten us to this point where NoMoreRepugs 7 hrs ago #16
Backchannel commitments for what? The rebuilding business deals that Trump wants the bribe money to be spent on? ChicagoTeamster 7 hrs ago #17
Maybe they're trying to figure out ways to WestMichRad 6 hrs ago #26
Which is why they wanted to delay releasing the text until at least Friday.. SamuelAdams 7 hrs ago #18
It was a birthday party favor for the man-child... Hugin 7 hrs ago #19
Ah, Yessss; The Old "Back-Channel Commitments" Trick..... ColoringFool 6 hrs ago #22
A "political document" only existing as a birthday present for the loser in the white house. travelingthrulife 6 hrs ago #23
$300,000,000,000 is still $300,000,000,000. paulkienitz 6 hrs ago #24
Per "back-channel agreements" it is probably 500 billion (classified for purposes of National Security) pat_k 4 hrs ago #32
Trump and his war-mongering assholes are desperate agingdem 5 hrs ago #27
I'm surprised they're not communicating in "pig latin". Buddyzbuddy 5 hrs ago #28
Maybe Dotard tore up the original agreement because he didn't know about its maxsolomon 4 hrs ago #29
TACO !! republianmushroom 4 hrs ago #30
Of course, any back-channel agreements are WORSE. pat_k 4 hrs ago #31
Ooh backchannel commitments Johnny2X2X 3 hrs ago #33
They're just words. Nothing to see here. Scalded Nun 3 hrs ago #34
Translation: the memorandum isn't worth the paper it's printed on. patphil 2 hrs ago #35
Give me a break. City Lights 2 hrs ago #36
LOL! Did Dean Wormer put Iran on double-secret probation? Mysterian 6 min ago #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US officials downplay tex...