Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

reACTIONary

(7,441 posts)

10. These loans are financed....

Reply to in2herbs (Reply #8)

Tue Jun 23, 2026, 07:58 PM

Jun 23

.....through the DOE’s Title 17 Energy Financing Program. The Title 17 program operates using existing borrowing authority, credit subsidy appropriations, and permanent loan guarantee authority established by Congress across multiple past statutes rather than a single specific congressional bill.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

blondebanshee okaawhatever wyn borkins

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump administration announces $17.5 billion in loans for 10 new large nuclear reactors [View all] BumRushDaShow Jun 23 OP

Nuclear reactors themselves don't bother me GenThePerservering Jun 23 #1

True that! Hopefully... reACTIONary Jun 23 #9

They've slashed safety regulations for plant construction/operation. There were posts here about that some time back. highplainsdem Jun 23 #13

Just found the thread I posted then, which links to another thread about it: highplainsdem Jun 23 #14

Thanks! reACTIONary Jun 23 #15

It seems that these changes apply.... reACTIONary Jun 23 #17

They've been weakening safety requirements everywhere. Contnuing to do so with nuclear reactors. See highplainsdem Jun 23 #20

Thanks! reACTIONary Jun 23 #24

Response from the AGs of several Democratic states: highplainsdem Jun 23 #22

We had one built in Kansas 40 years ago and it sky rocketed our rates. All they've Bengus81 Jun 24 #29

Most likely as dedicated power for data centers. pecosbob Jun 23 #2

And what are their plans for the nuclear waste? nt pnwmom Jun 23 #3

They will let Dems take care of that small problem. republianmushroom Jun 23 #7

There is no rational reason to build new nuclear plants WSHazel Jun 23 #4

You're overthinking it maxrandb Jun 23 #18

my $2800 solar rooftop been working silently for 18 yrrs and NO cost overrun. paid off 10 yrs ago msongs Jun 23 #5

But wind turbines cause cancer. republianmushroom Jun 23 #6

If Congress has the purse and must approve what the expenditure is for, how does F45 have the in2herbs Jun 23 #8

These loans are financed.... reACTIONary Jun 23 #10

Not Enough modrepub Jun 23 #11

Yeah, just wait not fooled Jun 23 #12

Those plants were so GD expensive to build forty years ago it almost BK KG&E in Kansas Bengus81 Jun 24 #30

Same company that built the reactors at Fukushima flamingdem Jun 23 #16

I keep feeling something inside me that says we're in for a major slightlv Jun 23 #19

Better this than gas power plants which will have killed billions of people... hunter Jun 23 #21

Hmmm lonely bird Jun 23 #23

maybe we can convince them that neutrons have life-extending properties? DBoon Jun 24 #26

How about we build one in the West palm beach area? Bengus81 Jun 24 #31

Just kick that plutonium waste down the road for future generations to worry about. LudwigPastorius Jun 24 #25

Moron.Hurry up and bed down for your dirt nap. 58Sunliner Jun 24 #27

Trump is paying billions to cancel wind power while paying billions more to support nuclear power. Lonestarblue Jun 24 #28

I think I'd rather see one Diablo Canyon sized nuclear power plant... hunter Jun 24 #32