Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bengus81

(10,572 posts)
30. Those plants were so GD expensive to build forty years ago it almost BK KG&E in Kansas
Wed Jun 24, 2026, 07:30 AM
15 hrs ago

What saved them? A MASSIVE rate increase before the plant was even operational.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nuclear reactors themselves don't bother me GenThePerservering Yesterday #1
True that! Hopefully... reACTIONary Yesterday #9
They've slashed safety regulations for plant construction/operation. There were posts here about that some time back. highplainsdem Yesterday #13
Just found the thread I posted then, which links to another thread about it: highplainsdem Yesterday #14
Thanks! reACTIONary Yesterday #15
It seems that these changes apply.... reACTIONary Yesterday #17
They've been weakening safety requirements everywhere. Contnuing to do so with nuclear reactors. See highplainsdem Yesterday #20
Thanks! reACTIONary 23 hrs ago #24
Response from the AGs of several Democratic states: highplainsdem 23 hrs ago #22
We had one built in Kansas 40 years ago and it sky rocketed our rates. All they've Bengus81 15 hrs ago #29
Most likely as dedicated power for data centers. pecosbob Yesterday #2
And what are their plans for the nuclear waste? nt pnwmom Yesterday #3
They will let Dems take care of that small problem. republianmushroom Yesterday #7
There is no rational reason to build new nuclear plants WSHazel Yesterday #4
You're overthinking it maxrandb Yesterday #18
my $2800 solar rooftop been working silently for 18 yrrs and NO cost overrun. paid off 10 yrs ago msongs Yesterday #5
But wind turbines cause cancer. republianmushroom Yesterday #6
If Congress has the purse and must approve what the expenditure is for, how does F45 have the in2herbs Yesterday #8
These loans are financed.... reACTIONary Yesterday #10
Not Enough modrepub Yesterday #11
Yeah, just wait not fooled Yesterday #12
Those plants were so GD expensive to build forty years ago it almost BK KG&E in Kansas Bengus81 15 hrs ago #30
Same company that built the reactors at Fukushima flamingdem Yesterday #16
I keep feeling something inside me that says we're in for a major slightlv Yesterday #19
Better this than gas power plants which will have killed billions of people... hunter Yesterday #21
Hmmm lonely bird 23 hrs ago #23
maybe we can convince them that neutrons have life-extending properties? DBoon 22 hrs ago #26
How about we build one in the West palm beach area? Bengus81 15 hrs ago #31
Just kick that plutonium waste down the road for future generations to worry about. LudwigPastorius 22 hrs ago #25
Moron.Hurry up and bed down for your dirt nap. 58Sunliner 22 hrs ago #27
Trump is paying billions to cancel wind power while paying billions more to support nuclear power. Lonestarblue 15 hrs ago #28
I think I'd rather see one Diablo Canyon sized nuclear power plant... hunter 7 hrs ago #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump administration anno...»Reply #30