The Case For A 100-Justice Supreme Court

[mahatmakanejeeves]

Mike Masnick
‪@masnick.com‬

Once again, I think 13 Justices is the wrong way to do it. It appears like "packing" the court. If you go with *100* Justices, who handle cases on panels of 9, you fix the underlying problem of a small number of justices.
https://www.techdirt.com/2026/01/16/the-case-for-a-100-justice-supreme-court/

The Case For A 100-Justice Supreme Court
With the current mess that the US is in, there has been plenty of talk of “what comes after” and how to think about the big structural changes needed to prevent another authoritarian fr…
www.techdirt.com

‪Brad Lander‬
‪@bradlander.bsky.social‬
· 12h

We can’t clean up Washington without restoring integrity to the Supreme Court.

That’s why I believe we should expand the Supreme Court to 13 justices. And then, institute term limits.

Because an appointment to the Supreme Court shouldn’t mean a lifetime lack of accountability.


2:01 AM · Mar 4, 2026

Once again, I think 13 Justices is the wrong way to do it. It appears like "packing" the court. If you go with *100* Justices, who handle cases on panels of 9, you fix the underlying problem of a small number of justices. www.techdirt.com/2026/01/16/t...

— Mike Masnick (@masnick.com) 2026-03-04T07:01:30.301Z