Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,400 posts)
13. I think AI is in the background, being used for jobs humans used to do, men included. Though AI will never surpass human
Mon May 25, 2026, 04:57 PM
May 25

judgment, it's still out there in the background, corporations using it and laying off thousands; Silicon Valley layoffs are in media while other layoffs aren't. But it's happening.

Back in the day I struggled for 18 years to raise a child and live within my means on one income.

These days I'm not so sure it would be different.

Data show that nationally, about 33% of young adults (ages 18–34) still live with their parents, and this figure jumps to nearly 50% for those aged 18–29. Among slightly older young adults (ages 25–34), about 18% reside at home, a figure that reflects a persistent affordability squeeze driven by record-high rent prices and tough housing markets.

When it comes to higher cost of living states, experts emphasize that for many young Americans, moving back home or staying at home is increasingly viewed as a deliberate financial survival and wealth-building strategy rather than a failure to launch. Skill building that won't be taken over by AI is now an ongoing major consideration.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Even if I were inclined to have wanted kids, FoxNewsSucks May 25 #1
Totally understandable. Yours is the same reason my youngest son refuses to ever have children. ancianita May 25 #2
Yep. I felt that way 45 years ago. Auggie May 25 #3
The reason for so few babies is that people can now plan their families and avoid unwanted pregnancies. Midnight Writer May 25 #4
Maybe to some extent, but hope or no hope for the near future seems to matter greatly Attilatheblond May 25 #6
We had our two sons when Bill Clinton was President. We wouldn't do so now, were we young enough to do so. NNadir May 25 #5
Understood. Were I young I'd note the international numbers and seriously consider doing the same. ancianita May 25 #11
I have always told right to lifers randr May 25 #7
Amen, amen! ancianita May 25 #8
George Carlin's description of pro-forced birthers, oops, right-to-lifers: niyad May 25 #10
I was very fortunate to come of age when The Pill was becoming niyad May 25 #9
It takes two incomes in many cases just to pay for rent, car, living expenses. Diamond_Dog May 25 #12
I think AI is in the background, being used for jobs humans used to do, men included. Though AI will never surpass human ancianita May 25 #13
My grandson decided at the age of twenty-two that he was never going to have kids. Aristus May 25 #14
It is because women now have a choice to say "no" to men and their institutions. valleyrogue May 25 #15
yup Skittles May 25 #16
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Why So Few Babies? We Mig...»Reply #13