Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Artists

ornotna

(11,267 posts)

12. It was the mid to late 1600's

Reply to lunatica (Reply #11)

Mon Aug 30, 2021, 12:11 AM

Aug 2021

Times were so much different back then. I guess I'm not as adverse to it. I actually like the restored version and find it fascinating that he used the Cupid more than once.

Twice in less than 40 paintings. My guess is he liked it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A Restored Vermeer Painting Reveals a Hidden Cupid Artwork Hanging in the Background [View all] ornotna Aug 2021 OP

This is really cool. I think I'll be looking for more blank walls in the old masters works..... EarnestPutz Aug 2021 #1

Interesting for sure. But, I can't help but think the artist may have chosen to paint over the hlthe2b Aug 2021 #2

I agree happybird Aug 2021 #3

Wasn't done by Vermeer according to the experts ornotna Aug 2021 #4

The Victorians were terrible about this kind of vandalism localroger Aug 2021 #7

It would be interesting to know, for sure. CrispyQ Aug 2021 #6

Painted over because someone was offended by a naked boy? Bayard Aug 2021 #5

Rumor has it skip fox Aug 2021 #8

I like the one without the Cupid much more lunatica Aug 2021 #9

Interesting that the same Cupid shows up in another of his paintings ornotna Aug 2021 #10

Jarring isn't it? lunatica Aug 2021 #11

It was the mid to late 1600's ornotna Aug 2021 #12