Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nay

(12,051 posts)
3. Oh, very true. It's not like these schools take just anybody. You do have to be uber smart,
Thu May 2, 2013, 11:20 AM
May 2013

and to act as if lesser-rated schools have the same quality of students as a top-rated school is a big stumbling block to these statistics. Maybe the gist of the piece is aimed toward the students who COULD have a shot at being accepting into top schools; this gives them a reason to justify the cost. If they can get in, it will be worth it.

But that brings me to my points--if we compare the success rates of similarly-rated students, one group who attended a top school and one group who did not (for reasons unrelated to their intelligence, drive, or personality, we could maybe separate out the reasons why the top schools deliver.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»The ROI of college: Is go...»Reply #3