Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(21,875 posts)

5. Yes

Thu Mar 26, 2026, 09:50 AM

20 hrs ago

However, there is not an exclusive choice between burning coal or nuclear fission, which you steadfastly refuse to acknowledge.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Extreme global climate outcomes are possible even at 2C of warming [View all] OKIsItJustMe Yesterday OP

Yes, but Fukushima was worse, right? NNadir 23 hrs ago #2

False Dichotomy OKIsItJustMe 21 hrs ago #3

Yes OKIsItJustMe 20 hrs ago #5

Something you won't bother to read OKIsItJustMe 19 hrs ago #8

The sort of evidence you ignore because it doesn't support your narrative OKIsItJustMe 18 hrs ago #11

A scientist looks at evidence for and against their theories OKIsItJustMe 18 hrs ago #13

China is adding renewable capacity MUCH faster than it is adding Nuclear. thought crime 12 hrs ago #16

The "nukes-only" folk don't understand the word "transition". thought crime 12 hrs ago #17