Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(37,989 posts)
12. I refer you to post #9 in this thread. As for climate gas reductions in China, attributing them to solar...
Thu Mar 26, 2026, 12:26 PM
18 hrs ago

...in a country that is building nuclear plants at a rate not seen since the 20th century in the United States and in France, is inherently dishonest.

In this century, China has brought 61 nuclear reactors on line, and has 38 under construction. Their reactors can run day or night, on windy days and on still days.

Of course, one is free to claim something about "narratives" and bias, but it might be wise to consider whether this is a pot and kettle case.

I have already made clear that nuclear energy, in China, and everywhere else on Earth for that matter, has a far higher capacity utilization than solar and wind junk.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

James Hansen et al: Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and... OKIsItJustMe Yesterday #1
Yes, but Fukushima was worse, right? NNadir 23 hrs ago #2
False Dichotomy OKIsItJustMe 21 hrs ago #3
Bullshit. There is a CAUSE of the climate collapse, and it is the use of fossil fuels. NNadir 21 hrs ago #4
Yes OKIsItJustMe 20 hrs ago #5
Bullshit again. Nuclear energy is the ONLY form of power, worldwide, that exceeds the capacity utilization of coal... NNadir 20 hrs ago #6
As usual, you suggest that anyone who disagrees with you in the slightest degree is ignorant and/or stupid OKIsItJustMe 20 hrs ago #7
As usual I note that while I respect and utilize the IEA tables giving historical data, I have zero respect for... NNadir 19 hrs ago #9
Something you won't bother to read OKIsItJustMe 19 hrs ago #8
I read all day long, but I am very clear that the word "Watt" is a unit of PEAK power, not energy. If one... NNadir 19 hrs ago #10
The sort of evidence you ignore because it doesn't support your narrative OKIsItJustMe 18 hrs ago #11
I refer you to post #9 in this thread. As for climate gas reductions in China, attributing them to solar... NNadir 18 hrs ago #12
A scientist looks at evidence for and against their theories OKIsItJustMe 18 hrs ago #13
Again, bullshit: Pot and Kettle. I have merely pointed out that climate gas reductions in China can be attributed... NNadir 17 hrs ago #14
From the data at the link in post #14, one can calculate that the capacity utilization of nuclear plants in China NNadir 17 hrs ago #15
Um, it would seem - not all that surprising - that "I'm not an antinuke" antinukes around here no nothing at all... NNadir 6 sec ago #18
China is adding renewable capacity MUCH faster than it is adding Nuclear. thought crime 12 hrs ago #16
The "nukes-only" folk don't understand the word "transition". thought crime 12 hrs ago #17
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Extreme global climate ou...»Reply #12