Extreme global climate outcomes are possible even at 2C of warming

[NNadir]

14. Again, bullshit: Pot and Kettle. I have merely pointed out that climate gas reductions in China can be attributed...

...to a massive rate of building nuclear powerplants, not seen on this planet since the 20th century in the United States and France.

Attributing the reductions to unreliable energy, with a low capacity factor and thus incapable of addressing coal use, solar energy, is dishonest, and is an effort to deny evidence.

The data on the construction of nuclear power plants in China is publicly available:

Reactor database, China

The link gives the 2024 output of China's nuclear plants: 417,518 GWh. Note that this is a unit of energy, not power. It translates in SI units to 1.5 Exajoules of electricity, and a primary energy output, given that most of these plants are Rankine devices with an efficiency of roughly 33%, 4.6 Exajoules of primary energy.

In percent talk this primary energy is over 50% of the energy provided by all of the solar facilities on the planet as of 2024, as reported in post #9 with respect to the WEO data tables found on page 420 of the 2025 WEO.

I've been a working scientist for 40 years, and I don't need a lecture on the topic of evidence and data from hand wavers and dreamers, particularly when they demonstrate no ability to understand numbers.

Feel free to get back to me on the question of whether 9 + 9 = 18 is greater than 31.