Robert McCoy

[William Seger]

13. ... oh, and a fired physics professor

... who doesn't understand Newton's Third Law, or at least doesn't understand why his attempt at apply it to the WTC collapse ought to include the mass and inertia of the debris layer itself, which acted on the lower block but not the upper block. What this video really proves is that Bazant is more observant than these "truther scientists," and it doesn't take a physicist to see what they're missing. Jones also seems to be unaware that Bazant's actual argument, based on actual quantitative analysis which structural engineers seem to understand quite well, was that the structure could not possibly absorb the energy that was unleashed. If any competent structural engineer could show that Bazant's analysis is wrong about that, he or she would immediately become very famous. Instead, we get "Newton's Third Law" and "missing jolt" horseshit, and you still don't understand why experts don't take "truthers" seriously.