Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Open Invitation to Publicly Debate "William Seger" regarding the work of P4T. [View all]William Seger
(11,971 posts)22. Aw, c'mon, it's only 50 imaginary bucks
        With your awesome "debating" skillz, you must have sold hundreds of videos just to DUers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							48 replies
							
								
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                    
                        Open Invitation to Publicly Debate "William Seger" regarding the work of P4T. [View all]
							johndoeX
							Jun 2014
							OP
                        
        
        Anytime you are ready.... let us know. We can set up a mutual venue agreed upon by you and me.
        superbeachnut
        Jun 2014
        #9
      
        
        You can't explain "by an increase of 20 percent in equivalent airspeed at both constant Mach number"
        superbeachnut
        Jun 2014
        #21
      
        
        You and your crew have been losing public debates on dozens of websites for years,
        greyl
        Jun 2014
        #36
      
        
        Debate lost due to lack of physics at pilots for truth, and fake Vd definitions from journalist
        superbeachnut
        Jun 2014
        #44