Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dweller

(26,850 posts)
16. I specifically opened my post with 'imo'
Fri Jan 14, 2022, 01:29 PM
Jan 2022

as in ‘in my opinion’ … to the OP
You sound like a medical professional, and I am not.
I am instead an active patient immersed in cutting edge treatment for prostate cancer.
After too many years of nothing more than DREs and comments like ‘ your prostate is enlarged, we’ll have to wait and watch that’ I can understand the OP’s frustration in not knowing information that could be helpful.
I am fully aware of the advances in treatment for PC since I’ve been fully immersed in it for the last 3 years … also aware of the increase in occurrence of PC , as it is now #1 cancer in men, according to Cancer.org
As I posted to the OP knowing some specific test #’s, both PSA and Gleason scores would be helpful knowledge. Any dr unable to provide that info, well I’d be looking for a 2nd opinion at least.
And again, this is just my opinion… don’t even get me started on the sorry state of health care in this country … too many people including myself fall between the cracks, with many disastrous outcomes.

YMMV

✌🏻

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Equivocal"-- sorry but that is not uncommon. It means the lab could not be confirm hlthe2b Jan 2022 #1
Depends on the grade. If it is a low grade, it is not unreasonable to do what is called Active JohnSJ Jan 2022 #2
My last colonoscopy had results like that-- viva la Jan 2022 #3
It was a urologist that did the biopsy (n/t) MissMillie Jan 2022 #18
He would have referred him to an oncologist viva la Jan 2022 #21
Bet a lot the dr. said pre-cancerous and all he heard was cancer, that happened to a friend. lark Jan 2022 #4
The 'watch and wait' is worthless imo dweller Jan 2022 #5
Active Surveillance is NOT worthless. If the gleason grade is a 3+3 and small volume, the next step JohnSJ Jan 2022 #10
I specifically opened my post with 'imo' dweller Jan 2022 #16
Of course. This is a forum for opinions, and if my response sounded abraisve that sure wasn't my JohnSJ Jan 2022 #17
His PSA was elevated MissMillie Jan 2022 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2022 #6
You are absolutely right Chin. In addition, a diagnosis of prostate cancer does not mean a death JohnSJ Jan 2022 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2022 #14
There can be what's called atypical cells which means they are not quite normal, but not as yet PortTack Jan 2022 #7
that sounds familiar MissMillie Jan 2022 #20
When I first had a biopsy for what eventually turned out to be cancer, woodsprite Jan 2022 #8
I believe the biopsy failed to show what the mri showed. It might look like CA on the scan mitch96 Jan 2022 #9
Very true, and hopefully they did what is referred to as a directed biopsy based on the JohnSJ Jan 2022 #15
It's been a while since I was in the medical field.. Fusion bx was just coming in when I mitch96 Jan 2022 #22
Get a copy of the medical records including test and biopsy results. 58Sunliner Jan 2022 #11
I strongly recommend the book "Invasion of the Prostate Snatchers", by Dr. Mark Scholz, to educate JohnSJ Jan 2022 #13
Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Cancer Support»Isn't a biopsy supposed t...»Reply #16