Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(65,134 posts)
9. Try this:
Tue Mar 6, 2018, 02:01 PM
Mar 2018
Edith Roberts Editor

Posted Tue, March 6th, 2018 7:07 am

eroberts@scotusblog.com

Tuesday round-up

....
Briefly:
....

• In an essay available at SSRN, Michael McConnell considers Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court will decide whether the First Amendment bars Colorado from requiring a baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding; he maintains that although “[s]ome may say that [a decision in favor of the baker] prioritizes one right over another – the right of freedom of speech, or perhaps the freedom of religion — over the right not to suffer invidious discrimination,” such a decision would instead “put these rights on an equal plane.”
....

Recommended Citation: Edith Roberts, Tuesday round-up, SCOTUSblog (Mar. 6, 2018, 7:07 AM), http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/03/tuesday-round-up-418/

Dressmakers, Bakers, and the Equality of Rights

You can download the paper or open it as a .pdf document.

DRESSMAKERS, BAKERS, AND THE EQUALITY OF RIGHTS

Michael W. McConnell

Richard and Frances Mallery Professor and Director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, and former Circuit Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

be best to offer such a case. BTW, its a purpose of the Supreme Court beachbum bob Mar 2018 #1
E.g. 1st and 2nd Amendment. DetlefK Mar 2018 #2
under what scenario is the conflict? I don't see any possible one occurring.... beachbum bob Mar 2018 #3
That's irrelevant. DetlefK Mar 2018 #4
no context. As we have had the constitution for a few hundred years and no instance beachbum bob Mar 2018 #5
Okay, if you insist, here's one example of clashing rights: DetlefK Mar 2018 #6
Bad example WPB_dem Mar 2018 #7
Waitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwait DetlefK Mar 2018 #11
Hi again discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #12
How do you know that there is no such right? DetlefK Mar 2018 #13
mea culpa discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #14
Agree with WPB_Dem JayhawkSD Mar 2018 #8
Try this: mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2018 #9
try this one: discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #10
Fair trial vs. free press: ..... lastlib Mar 2018 #15
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»What happens when constit...»Reply #9